this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)

World News

39082 readers
3681 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The taped banana - now perhaps one of the most expensive fruits ever sold - was actually bought earlier in the day for a mere $0.35, according to the New York Times.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Traditional art was just NFTs all along.
🌍🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You mean it's all money laundering?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Dude I put that on a tee for you.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

Ah-ha! Now you have missed the meme reply!
Check and mate. 😏

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 106 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] ChanchoManco@lemm.ee 10 points 17 hours ago

The fact that it was bought by a crypto "entrepreneur" pretty much confirms it.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yo I was about to comment this.

Like literally.

How do you transfer a huge amount of money.

Just get the receipient to create "art"

Instruct receipient to sell "art" for the amount of money

Voila, legal money laundering!

[–] dai@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Was commonplace in vanilla wow, you would see common items in the Auction House selling for silly prices - those were the players buying gold. Washing it via the auction house making it seem more legitimate.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, it's the first thing I thought. Everybody else sees it too, right? This is well past dadaism.

...but wasn't this the case all along in the art market, except for institutional buyers?

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand how buying art with 6.2 m in cash is not going to be suspicious though?

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Because you “can’t put a price on art”. Assuming there’s a sales tax or something for the sale, it’s pretty much a legit sale.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For real. If I really wanted the "art" I wouldn't have to spend more than $15. $5 for a roll of duct tape, $10 for a banana.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

I see what you did there

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I too have a nearly perfect replica of this piece. I'm selling each piece, which is part of an extremely limited run of 1000 pieces in total produced this week on demand, signed and sealed in a Tupperware container for freshness, for $2,990 each, worldwide shipping is just another $299.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

I'd be willing to sell it for $299 with $29 shipping, what a steal!

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I might be splitting hairs, but it’s appeal.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's a pun. A peel, like the skin on a banana.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As was mine, albeit a poor one.

Splitting as in banana split.

[–] Aedis@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it seems the puns come in bunches.

[–] 2deck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Is the banana for scale?

[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's really just one of a limited number of licenses which allows the owner of the license to showcase the work and legally regard it as an official work from the artist who first came up with the idea. Anyone can tape a banana to a wall, but only a few can do so and say that it's an 'original'.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if I can trust the license. Any way to make it burn a ton of electricity to function?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

We'll do I have a bridge to sell you!

[–] Mojave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  • who gives a shit if it's original or derivative
  • Tape a different fruit and it's now a new original
[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I agree, it's very absurd, and that's part of the point. It's also obvious too that someone gives a shit since they're willing to shell out millions of dollars for it. And as far as taping another piece of fruit to the wall, it unlikely to do well because with modern and conceptual art, it's all about who came up with the idea first.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do this as an institution you'll get nuked in court.

Do this as an individual nobody will pay to see it.

The more you complain the more it's worth.

People pay money to see it because it's controversial.

That's why it's art.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That's why I consider AI art actually art.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You cannot stop idiots from being stupid.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Actually we are the idiots, because we just let them launder money

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The rich need more money laundering vehicles.