this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
353 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
4688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

... for now

[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

This seems like a clever way of saying they don't have an AI team or plans so they have no use for the data.

Brilliant!

[–] MrFootball@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What’s the problem of training AI with my posts?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

"we promise ;)"

[–] macstainless@discuss.tchncs.de 134 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh it will as soon as the investors demand more ReTurN oN iNvEsTmEnT.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s a Public Benefit Corp structure, so legally investors have very little power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Then we leave that platform too. I have zero loyalty. Zero.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 77 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Well, WE won't train on your data. But this subsidiary company we created on the other hand..."

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or one of our 12675 carefully selected partners

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sounds exactly like something that someone intending to train an AI would say.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Davel23@fedia.io 33 points 1 week ago

BlueskAI on the other hand...

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the AT protocol allows public access to content, they can’t create a proprietary training set. But the content is available for anyone who wants to add it to a public training set.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 20 points 1 week ago

Trust me bro, just keep shit posing on here, we won't change out "ToS"

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Better BlueSky than Twitter, but I hope everyone understands by now that there’s literally no reason to take a business’s word for anything unless they somehow have legally obligated themselves to doing that thing forever. Otherwise you can only trust them to keep doing it for as long as it’s worth it from an economic perspective. I’m not saying that it can’t ever happen that a business acts out of pure goodwill, but only a fool would count on it.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

"Don't be evil" ...

... for now

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't get it. They were rich beyond most people's wildest dreams. Why did they jump aboard the enshitification bandwagon?

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Money is power, and people with money like to habe power.

If someone else is pulling in more money, you're going to find yourself with less power.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These were a couple of PhD geeks who hit it big, it's certainly not inevitable that intelligent people get absorbed with money, see the creator of VLC for example. It's just sad that these guys could have been rich AND kept the internet 'pure' and research focused. But instead commerce has crept in and taken a shit on what was once a clean simple brilliant search service.

[–] voracread@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What happened with VLC? This is the first time I am hearing it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

They want to be rich beyond EVERYONE'S wildest dreams.

Why else?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Public trading... it's capitalism. By law you have to try and extort every penny.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now that I think about it I'm not sure why they had to accept investor money at all. I wonder if it would have turned out differently if they had remained 100% privately owned?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

Because growth... Without the R&D money, Microsoft or Yahoo, or someone else would have figured out how to do what they do faster/better, waited until google was a forgotten name and then enshittified.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you make a lot of money, the number you see in your account starts to become part of your identity because it differentiates you between you and the people you see every day. The same way if I had blue curly hair, that would become a defining factor of where I “differ” from the general public. The numbers in one’s account becomes an obsession-point.

People get obsessed with the number and how much bigger they can make it. It’s like hoarding. No amount will ever be enough. And once you’re able to buy anything, the actual value of that money becomes meaningless. So even more drive to bring the number up because that’s the only novelty you are getting.

That and power.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

When you make a lot of money, the number you see in your account starts to become part of your identity because it differentiates you between you and the people you see every day.

"Tres Comas is for winners." (A wonderful line delivery by the huge asshole venture fund bro in Silicon Valley, that illustrates your point)

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›