When somebody laughes at your Facebook post, but you were being serious : memes

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 years ago

🤣

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

[–] MrWafflesNBacon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean...

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago

anything ruining Facebook, i approve of

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Just cancel Facebook all-together

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 6 points 2 years ago

When you google “First World Problems” this article should be the first result.

[–] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I fully endorse this headline. Unrelated: I stop reading at apostrophes.

Edit: In this case, I meant the second apostrophe. Fail.

[–] bratosch@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

No laughing matter: Why it

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

No laughing matter: why it"

I also endorse this headline

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Post dumb Facebook post

Get laughed at

Write angry blog post why others are wrong and I am right

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

Write angry blog post about why criticizing people should be impossible

FTFY

[–] dipshit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

eh? heh hee hee!

[+] vexikron@lemmy.zip -14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

That emoji captures how I feel toward anyone who still has a Facebook account.

Facebook got its angel investment from a front company for the NSA, and the NSA cancelled a project to figure out how to do mass domestic surveillance literally 24 hours prior.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah ima go ahead and slap a

[citation needed]

all over that until a cite is provided

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

His citation is just a picture of Obi-Wan Kenobi saying of course he's got a source.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Apologies, it was DARPA program, and the funding came from the CIA, to Peter Thiel, to Facebook. Got my alphabet soup a bit mixed up.

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/04/investigative-reports/the-military-origins-of-facebook/

I assumed this story was common knowledge?

Guess not.

Anyway yeah, when part of your job includes managing cybersecurity policies for a medium sized organization, its behooves oneself to do some research into the most well known data thieves in the world, the US Government.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What brand of foil do you use for your hats? I find Reynolds to be too expensive but anything else I just don't feel like does a good job blocking the beta waves

[–] kelseybcool@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What big brother doesn't want you to know:

Any brand as long as it has nonstick coating.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ms. Krabaple, I ate my foil...

[–] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I prefer my tinfoil hats in cast iron

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I only use the tinfoil in my wallet.

I remember everyone calling me crazy in the early 2010's for pointing out that the new smart chips in credit cards could be read by various electronic devices, and that this could be blocked by basically lining your wallet with tinfoil.

Nowadays of course you can just buy wallets with it neatly built in.

You can also line a backpack or laptop bag with tinfoil on the inside to do shoplifting, as long as they have the older style scanning towers.

[–] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

https://www.csoonline.com/article/561891/why-you-dont-need-an-rfid-blocking-wallet.html

RFID-related crime isn’t only very unlikely, it’s non-existent.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So a crime perpetrated by highly technically competent attackers, that can be done and hidden easily by such highly competent attackers, has never been proved to have happened, even though this very article outlines that it is very doable...

Do you think this means I am somehow incorrect in stating that this is a thing that can happen? An article that explains that it can happen?

Or do you think it 'proves' that it doesnt make sense to worry about, or take steps to mitigate?

I got the RFID mitigating wallet I have for 10 dollars. Its a great wallet, easily worth 10 dollars whether or not it has RFID protection.

[–] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a non-existent crime. You do you, man.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, I know how to do it and get away with it, but I dont because I am a decent person.

[–] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'm sure you do, bud.

[–] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Source please

[–] doctorn@r.nf 2 points 2 years ago

It's from a parody news website:

-The actual article-

So sadly not real, but I still thought it represented Facebook-folk quite well. 😅

memes

Community rules

Sister communities