this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
276 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
276
Food prices worried most voters, but Trump's plans likely won't lower their grocery bills (apnews.com)
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary

Americans, frustrated by high grocery prices, are looking to President-elect Trump for relief. Trump has pledged to lower food costs through tariffs on imports and by reducing energy prices, arguing that these measures would benefit U.S. farmers and consumers.

However, experts warn that tariffs could drive up prices by increasing costs for imported goods essential to food production and risk retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports.

Economists also doubt Trump’s short-term impact on energy costs, noting that sustained grocery price drops are challenging without major economic shifts.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Also deporting millions of farm workers isn't going to help prices stabilize when farmers have vegetables rotting on the vine because they can't afford US citizens and how much they expect to be paid to be a farm-hand and on top of that US citizens tend to be fat and fucking lazy in comparison to the immigrant laborers.

Further, in Washington state, many immigrants have made a livelihood by working their way up and buying the orchard out from the owner. How many of those immigrants will be denaturalized and now the orchard has no ownership and is up for grabs at pennies on the dollar, further consolidating food ownership.

If the US dollar is still somehow the world's reserve currency after all this fucking idiocy, I'll genuinely be shocked.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm also going to note that a ton of slaughterhouse workers are either undocumented or are the sorts of legal first-generation Latino immigrants Trump would still want to illegally deport. Even as a vegan who wants to see this industry die I can see how fucking disastrous that kind of shock would be for food prices. Even the change in public perception would be massive since it seems like the price of meat is one of the most significant barometers most meat-eaters use for how expensive groceries are.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

Probably because meats are relatively expensive and they consider them to be necessary rather than an optional luxury item.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not to mention that restaurants heavily rely on undocumented immigrants in their kitchens.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 7 points 1 week ago

Also deporting millions of farm workers isn't going to help prices stabilize when farmers have vegetables rotting on the vine because they can't afford US citizens and how much they expect to be paid to be a farm-hand and on top of that US citizens tend to be fat and fucking lazy in comparison to the immigrant laborers.

We can just use High School kids again. /s

If the US dollar is still somehow the world's reserve currency after all this fucking idiocy, I'll genuinely be shocked.

If Trump's admin does crash the currency look for him to try and shift the US to his crypto grift coin which is I'm sure 100% legit and will not benefit from new regulation written around it being a black box of money laundering/bribe/slush fund.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they deport them they lose both their bottom, most exploitable social group, and the hate/fear catalyst for their base... The idea is to take away all their rights and keep them subjugated.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

They also lose a bunch of customers, like 1-3% of them according to differing plans.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just going to leave this here.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where do you get those numbers? I mostly ask because I think the new car and used car prices seem high. Also, the rent seems low, but obviously rent is extremely location dependant.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I was paying more six years ago for a run down 2 bed apartment outside of Seattle but still within the metro. That rent figure is more in line with my current mortgage payment, but I bought at what I thought was going to be a stupid time (interest is still higher than what I bought at).

Base model 2024 Crosstrek is 25k, and I could get about 8k for my 18yo car. I'm sure a dealership would sell it for the same that I paid 9 years ago, ~12k.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This just reminds me. I need to stock up on popcorn.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 week ago

Trump will lower grocery prices the same day he ends the war in Gaza.

And if you believe that, I've got a hat to sell you (*made in China).

[–] Jinni@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone who understood what tariffs are could of told you this. Harris may not of had any economic plans other than ctax the 1%', but Trump's was demonstrably counter productive with tariffs

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Let me put it there for those idiots.

Tarrifs on food imports would be great for US farmers because they no longer have to compete with low priced imports, as the cost to import increases. You would induce a shortage at the current price point, resulting in less food avaliable and at a higher price.

Small point - farmers would probably still miss out as resellers and supermarkets take much of the marginal profit.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

On the other hand, with all of their workers having been deported, farmers wouldn't be able to produce anything at all. This is why I want to believe that Republican talk of deportation is just bluster, but I thought that about Roe v. Wade as well.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you might be looking at this wrong. Over 20% of agricultural products are exported in the US, less than 15% is imported. Food is a substitution commodity, if you can't buy one kind, you will buy another.

There is and will be no shortage of food in America. Food grown in central and south America? Maybe. This will just hurt all those farms exporting soy beans when the retaliation comes in to play.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, you are correct but I disagree on few technicalities that make a difference.

  • products do have substitutes, but you are talking comming down from a global market. Calories are there, but we don't eat based on calories. You can't substitute soybeans for tomatoes, potatoes for corn, or many others i don't have examples for.

  • when the US starts putting in tarrifs for import, other nation states will likely do the same. Your exports of unwanted goods will no longer be competitive in the global market, leading to an excess of unwanted, cheap food and shortage of wanted, expensive food.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

You should look up the last time the US employed massive tariffs in a trade war. Spoilers, it was just before the Great depression.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

After gutting a dozen departments he might just take the savings and straight up subsidize food staples. Apparently people don't give two fucks about why just as long as stuff is cheap.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not thinking Trump enough - he's going to give a "Trump coupon/Trump cheque" to subsidize your grocery bill.

[–] proper@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

that then you’d have to pay back in 4 years. added to your taxes to make the next person look bad.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Which can only be applied to Goya products.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Stuff doesn't get cheaper, only more profitable. Trump will subsidize stock prices while the price of eggs and milk continue to climb.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"you know I hate how he doesn't like minorities, lgbtq, ukraine, palestine, lebanon, created an insurrection, has sexual allegations, is a felon. But at least my groceries will be cheaper grin.png"

I bet a large chunk of the Trumpers thought like this

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is a felon

A few houses in my neighborhood had the "I'M VOTING FOR THE CONVICTED FELON" signs up. I would have assumed this meant they were actually anti-Trump except they had a bunch of the conventional Trump signs up as well. My understanding of these people is that they think all the negative reporting about Trump is faked by the left (or that the criminal charges are invalid and politically motivated), not that they think it's all true and support him anyway.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

At work too my trumper coworkers said something like "people are saying how they're not voting for trump because he's a felon haha". These guys admit he's a felon and gladly vote for him.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The price of popcorn is definitely going to spike.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

likely

Likely!?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sun will likely set today.

[–] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

likely

Likely?!

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point I'm just going to sit back eat some popcorn and enjoy the show until they have my camp reservation ready.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

When they come for the non-christians, I can pass but my kids won't be able to :(

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

Fuck no this administration won't help. The best hope Americans had of lowering prices was Lina Kahn.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Spineless article.

If he implements tariffs, food bills will be higher.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

And, you know, fascism.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Tariffs will be the smallest issue here. Without illegals picking fruits, harvesting vegetables, caring for farm animals, or working in all kinds of food processing factories, food prices will go through the roof.

But that is 100% GOP strategy. People at the brink of catastrophy, those living paycheck to paycheck, are perfectly exploitable and controlable.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The only problem Trump plans on solving are his legal cases, his debt, and people saying he's no good. The rest is just whatever whim takes him that day. Looking to Trump to solve something for you? You're gonna have to wait till you've got something he wants.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

I would like to think that Democrats can hold him to this politically, but knowing them they will probably say it is their fault.