this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
19 points (67.9% liked)

Technology

1441 readers
837 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There’s just one catch: every atom in your body would be fully disassembled to the quantum level, effectively leaving your original body totally destroyed.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

talk about running before youre even freakin conceived. we cant 'teleport' a single molecule

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can teleport anything? An atom, perhaps?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

nope. just not possible with our current tech. im not aware of any tech that even lets you deposit an atom at a location on demand merely simulating 'teleportation'

There was talk about teleporting a photon, but it was a mathematically possible (but technologically impossible) theory. A whole human is a pipedream.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I seem to remember researchers teleporting an atom like a decade ago. But then I never heard about it again.

[–] Kory@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because it was nowhere to be found after the teleport.

No seriously, I remember that too, but I think it was a photon.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

OK but a photon isn't an atom.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The idea behind it is to do it at the subatomic level. And no, that's not how the quantum locking works. I have not read the article but it's likely by someone who doesn't know shit about shit.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

A brief, limited form of information of sorts. That's all.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Complete BS article.

Quantum teleportation is very different from scifi teleportation.

Quantum teleportation is a way to bypass the heisenburg uncertainty principal. You take a particle and entangle it (in a special way) with a carrier particle. You then send the carrier (generally a photon) to another particle of the same type as the first. When they interact, most of the properties of the first particle are transferred to the second.

This is extremely useful for things like quantum computing, but has no real path to teleporting a human.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

There’s just one catch: every atom in your body would be fully disassembled to the quantum level, effectively leaving your original body totally destroyed.

So just like Star Trek

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would absolutely volunteer for this, abso-friggin-lutely.

If I die in the process, I'm not gonna know it, and new me ain't gonna either. At least that's how I see it.

Now that trump won ill even volunteer to go first LOL.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You should read The Jaunt to acquire the completely healthy and rational fear of teleportation

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Ha! Came here to tell OP it's probably a longer trip than he thinks.

[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That story gives me chills every time I think about the woman.

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

Replicators first, please.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Even if they manage this, I'll bet "you" die each time something 'effectively ... destroy[s]" you down to a quantum level.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm of the opinion that it doesn't really matter. My consciousness ends every time I fall unconscious.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Knowledge and memories have to be physically encoded somewhere right? Surely it's just chemistry

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah. Not only that, but if there is some sort of quantum state that represents the you that is you, beyond just your memories, but literally down to the spins of sub atomic particles that make you up, and you are able to transfer that state one way, making it appear exactly somewhere else (and presumably causing the state to cease to exist where it started), I'm happy to consider that full blown teleportation, no death whatsoever. You weren't deconstructed at point a and rebuilt at point b, you literally teleported.

[–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

True. It's also physics.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That depends on the nature of what "you" ultimately turn out to be. I tend to suspect (though with only a suspicion to go on and not proof, I probably wouldn't be volunteering) that what "you" ultimately are is the pattern of information stored in the structure of your brain, and thus, any sufficiently perfect copy of that information is the "same" person regardless of continuity of the body. Though creating a second copy before destroying the original would have the caveat that as soon as the second you exists, the different perspective and experience will lead them to diverge into two different people who both have equal claim to the original identity, so that I think to do this, you'd want to destroy the original slightly before, making the process more like resurrection in a new location.

[–] Onihikage@beehaw.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I believe current understanding is that quantum shenanigans mean you can't truly make a perfect quantum duplicate of something without destroying the original at the same time, so what you're describing (destroying the original after making the copy) would only be possible for imperfect duplication - e.g. manufacturing a clone and syncing its memory with the original.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

We are easily thousands of years away from genuinely understanding this stuff. Right now we have absolutely no clue.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

There really should be a way around that part of things, maybe if the distance is short enough you could move particles instead of recreating them

[–] llamatron@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I teleported home one day,

With Ron and Sid and Meg.

Ron stole Meggy's heart away

And I got Sidney's leg

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

What a shit article "Hey we can do this to single photons and electrons! Whole humans are next!"

No they are not. This articles is just a vehicle to talk about the same-ass philosophical issues that have been talked about for as long as teleportation via technology has been thought about.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bet they come out like doodlebob

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It'd be easier to control wormholes and use those