This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
When I entered the work force in 2005, it was with a company that had never had a layoff in its thirty-year history.
Then, in 2009, they had their first layoff, and I learned later our CEO had taken an 80% pay raise that year.
Taxes aren't theft. Literally firing people and taking their salaries is theft.
Also that CEO has an eminently punchable face.
Taxes are theft the specific way they are designed in most countries.
Another example of theft is a hired administrator administrating by the criterion of their own pay.
I mean, it is understandable how this works - their pay is a counterweight to the incentive to "mismanage" the company if someone else pays a fitting price. The issue here is that these two incentives do not completely neutralize each other, in some dimension their components add up.
Why I had to say that taxes are still theft - because a CEO is equivalent to a state official in this issue. It's the same problem.
Political ideologies divide these problems, because political ideologies are like hedge funds, they diversify investments, so that every political ideology could be usable in every landscape for every policy. They are the opposite of consistent, by design.
Taxes aren't because they come from societal structure i.e agreement that we're better off pooling resources
“Look timmy, it’s a man made entirely of bullshit”
Thank god, all these employees lost their jobs so Satya Nadella can pad out their already insanely high salary.
We don't want Satya to starve like the rest us of plebs!
They should be paying 90% tax over 1 million.
Typical and most people in the US view CEO's as heroes. US income distribution is on the same level as fucking Russia.
As someone from fucking Russia, people with biggest income in your country are usually first businessmen, second - something else, while in Russia those would be cockroaches from MFA, PA and other thieves, plus a few oligarchs who at some point were among those cockroaches.
So it may not be as bad yet, but frankly yes, you are giving out vibes of going in the same direction.
Pretty standard issue corporate psychopath.
An old friend was one of the people who got laid off in January. Fuck MSFT.
CEO = SIC: Shareholder in Chief
He made $12000 off each fired employee.
Per year. And lets not talk about his stock options and other benefits... Fucking disgusting.
The board doesn’t care about the number of people employed. They care about the current profitability and future profitability.
Of course that’s their job; to look after shareholder interests. And the money would move to a better investment if they didn’t.
It’s the whole system you need to change, if you seek change, not moan about an individual CEO.
That's why Mitbestimmungsgesetz can be goddamn fucking awesome.
That would be awesome, but would have limited results if there are still a few enormous companies with patent and IP laws preventing competition.
You can't have that eternal fight between democratic egalitarian monopoly and competitive jungle. The whole point of civilization is to have both representation and competition.
That would literally change everything for the better.
I've never heard of that. That's a cool idea.
Current profitability is up. Profit margins are also up from last year. But I could see investors looking at the lack of any path after the current Xbox and wondering why they employ so many there. I'm sure other areas have also seen some stagnation.
Headline confused "despite" and "due to"
yeah lol what do they think is happening here
Regulate monopolies. Eat the rich.
That’s roughly 30k for every employee laid off
That's some real bald-headed behavior if you ask me.
If they were software engineers, they saved $200,000+ per person laid off
That's how he makes dem big bux, by telling other people to fuck off
Sounds like an easy sell to the board, then. It it's that much of a net positive in economics.
When was the last time you got a 63% raise?
70% workload raise
Well his compensation is tied to the stock price so it’s not exactly a “raise.” My employer’s stock is near an all time high right now so I’m not complaining about how much I made from the shares I sold, but neither do I consider it a “raise” because it’s not guaranteed to be the same next year.
At my last company, they usually gave end-of-the-year bonuses instead of raises. They were pretty generous, usually amounting to about half of our annual salaries, but it of course prevented us from being guaranteed that level of compensation the following year. That's why I always describe bonuses as raises followed by pay cuts.
Yeah pretty much. Everything about it is a hedge. They can pay less if their numbers tell them to. They can lay you off and not give you anything. They can make more cash disappear if they have to. It’s the squirrelliest shit yet they cast it like a gift from god.
His salary increase must be inversely proportional to the quality increase in Windows 11.
You're saying he deserves more?!
Well Windows wasn't an important Microsoft product for like 15 years now. It's been like 7 years when Microsoft is a company mostly selling cloud Linux services. Ridiculous I know, but that's from their yearly financial reports. It seems their plan is to cash out Windows as fast as possible before dropping it.
his payrise is equivalent to something like 3000 US workers minimum wage annual salaries
if my math is correct (which it probably isn't)
Yup, that checks out for me.
That said, that's the federal minimum wage, which almost nobody actually gets (article says $1M people).
Well, yeah. How do you think they could afford Nadella's pay raise?
I would like to propose some changes to that title:
Microsoft CEO's pay rises 63% to $79m, ~~despite~~ [because of] devastating year for layoffs: 2550 ~~jobs lost~~ [employees were fired by their greedy CEO] in 2024 [because he wanted more money]
fuck him not just for making those people's lives miserable, but for stamping down the fucking wages of everyone else in tech by flooding the fucking market
I just want one outlet to break the shit cycle and report it for what it is : CEO got big pay rises thanks to savings made by eliminating jobs.
That is simply the neutral truth.
It’s not some freakish occurance, not some overtime golden goal shit, this is how it works. It’s the norm.
