this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
87 points (94.8% liked)

Open Source

30767 readers
505 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

Clickbait and misleading title, they're putting in motion what they said they would do for years. That being the manifest v3 change to extensions, and the deprecation of manifest v2.

[–] N4CHEM@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

Google is not killing uBlock Origin, it is making its Chrome browser even less user friendly. Just use Firefox or a Firefox fork.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 hours ago

The www has already gone to shit anyway thanks to SEO bullshit websites and AI generated garbage. Most of my online interactions are via applications these days. The more these companies ruin the www the less I find myself using a web browser.

[–] Soluna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 12 hours ago

Here's hoping this pushes more people to Firefox

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

What is this "chrome" thing I keep reading about? Be right back, my wolf needs to be fed.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I know people who don't care about ublock so I guess it's not relevant. People who care about ad blockers should just move to Firefox or brave

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

is Brave's ad blocker as good as UO?

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Emeraldlink25@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Brave has a built-in adblock. No extensions required.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Who thought it was a good idea to let an internet ad company control our internet client?

In other news:

.
I wonder if the web itself may bifurcate. Corporate, government, and most NGO websites will only respond to corporate browsers that run sanctioned DRM binary blobs to “verify” their “safety”. And then there is us, with our websites and our web clients.

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Librewolf is fine for now, but it is small tweaks tracking FF’s codebase. I think that given Mozilla’s trajectory, at some point someone will have to do a hard fork.

Someone could do a hard fork of Chromium now, for that matter, but I’m not aware of any so far.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Who thought it was a good idea to let an internet ad company control our internet client?

It seemed a lot more reasonable 15 years ago. The default on Windows at the time of Chrome's rise was Internet Explorer.

I am watching Ladybird with great interest. The world needs a new-from-the-ground-up browser.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Either ground-up or a hard fork. Or both. Both is good.