this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
367 points (98.4% liked)

Steam Deck

14667 readers
576 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The exact quote:

It is important to us, and we’ve tried to be really clear, we are not doing the yearly cadence. We’re not going to do a bump every year. There’s no reason to do that. And, honestly, from our perspective, that’s kind of not really fair to your customers to come out with something so soon that’s only incrementally better. So we really do want to wait for a generational leap in compute without sacrificing battery life before we ship the real second generation of Steam Deck. But it is something that we’re excited about and we’re working on.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 22 minutes ago

It's not what makes them money so they don't really have the business incentive for maximizing hardware sales that leads to a relentless pushing out of new versions of their hardware that are barely better than the last one and all manner of tricks for early obsolescence of older devices (things like purposeful OS and App under-performance and even incompatibility with older versions of the hardware).

Also in the big picture of gaming the Steam Deck is tiny and in its early stages, so business-wise is not the time to go down a strategy of relentless new hardware versions and enshittification, quite the opposite.

Absolutely, they're doing the right thing and as the right thing aligns with their business objectives it's a bit wishful thinking to claim its because they care so much about their customers as people.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 28 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A desperately needed view in an industry of fashionable e-waste. Apple, Google and now Microsoft: I'm looking at you

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Number must go up

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Might sound kind of stupid, but one thing I'd personally love for the steam deck would be the ability to detach the display from the controls on each side like the Nintendo switch so I could use it like a small tablet in portrait mode. You can already do that, but it's awkward and bulky.

I'd actually use it for browsing the web on desktop mode and I could probably get rid of my android tablet.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 5 points 2 hours ago

Nah. One big piece let's them fit more excellent inside.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I just sold my 4090 after playing some latest hit AAA games I didn’t like at all and I play only indies on deck, it’s the best gaming device ever

Also it seems the only games I liked from hundreds of aaa graphics eye candies from recent years are rdr2 and cyberpunk and bg3. I unironically think there are fewer great big aaa games nowadays cmv and I am not planning another xx90 card any time soon

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I really think we've already eclipsed that "generational gap" with all the massive increases in efficiency in the last year or so. But I'm glad they're not updating nonetheless. For a variety of reasons.

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing yet surpassed Zen2 low power efficiency in the SD. And by low power I mean under 10W power/performance.

New chips scale quite a bit better above 10W though.

Also I'm not sure if that's actually the HW limitation or just Valve tuning of the power behaviour. It's possible they can throw in Zen5 and tune it to that efficiency level while getting significant performance uplift over Zen2 at the same power.

Regarding GPU we will need much faster memory support to get any significant advantages even with RDNA4 as most iGPUs are starved for memory bandwidth anyways, not saying that RDNA4 wouldn't be an improvement, just that it won't be as big as a leap as it could be with faster memory.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Nothing yet surpassed Zen2 low power efficiency in the SD.

Qualcomm, Intel and Snapdragon have all released chips that blow it out of the water.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Qualcomm is Snapdragon, and that's ARM, which means half of your games will crash at random in the first 30 seconds or not boot at all

Intel has not done what you claim they have

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 9 minutes ago

Valve is already working on ARM support.

Intel absolutely has, if you look at the Lunar Lake stuff.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Intel is claiming that with the upcoming Arrow Lake series of CPUs will seriously cut down the power budget. Important clarifications on that, the TDP of Arrow Lake is still around 150W TDP but that doesn't mean it'll pull the full 150W all the time, and wait for third-party benchmarks before believing anything they say. Still if what they're claiming is half true mobile devices could be getting a huge boon.

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

As was already mentioned, I'm not discussing ARM. ARM has its own issues with compatibility on top of the Windows to Linux compatibility.

Not sure what you mean by Intel. MSI Claw showed quite abysmal performance at low power vs SD. Regrading their newest chips, I have no clue as of right now.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 11 minutes ago

You may not have been but I am. Valve is already working on ARM support.

MSI Claw showed quite abysmal performance

It also didn't have the new Lunar Lake chips.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

It's a completely different discussion if you throw ARM into the mix.

[–] nous@programming.dev 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

And given some recent news about Valve working on an ARM emulator and funding Arch Linux to help them start supporting ARM as well they might be working towards that. Though if that is for the deck 2 or something else further in the future is yet to be seen.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 13 minutes ago

Exactly. They're already working on ARM support.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago

It's rumored to be for new standalone VR.

But, well, future is a long time, especially on Valve Time. ;)

[–] TheYang@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

surprisingly not most of the time I checked.

Laptop/Mobile x86 seemed rather competetive to Laptop/Mobile ARM in performance/Watt

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

Well, let me rephrase it: it's a completely different discussion if you want to run Windows games on ARM without ridiculous performance losses due to translation from x86.

Until we get Proton running with near-native speeds on ARM like on x86 perf/watt isn't really that important.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

I’d like to get a Steam Deck but was wondering if it’s getting close to a newer, better version coming soon. This makes me feel more comfortable, not that I have the budget for one right now anyway.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Presumably this will mean a high-performance ARM CPU (comparable to the Apple M series), along with the dynamic recompilation technology Steam have been experimenting with. (It’s unlikely that Intel or AMD will deliver the generational leap they’re talking about.)

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This reminds me of an old thread on a random forum. Just when Sims 2 was released they were speculating what Sims 3 would look like.

Someone suggested that the next game will surely be in the source engine!

While your point is more realistic than that I still don't think valve could pull this off in reasonable time. Translation for games is extremely hard to do right. I think if at all there will be another generation of decks before we see something like this.

[–] asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 hours ago

Also honestly, proton being basically a public beta on the decks launch was one thing, But that's going to create even more issues on launch for the newer device unless they have it practically perfect before it comes out.

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Dynamic recompilation technology?

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's "FEX", Valve have apparently been testing it with Proton.

The Asahi Linux team have their own packaging/tooling around it, but theirs is slower at runtime because they have to run the games inside a VM as well.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 hours ago

Their stack is so brutal. It's incredible how they overcame it all.

ARM instruction set, wrong page size, GPU without documentation for which they reverse engineered a Vulkan and OpenGL driver.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 127 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

My biggest concern with SteamDeck was that it would become a 1-2 year upgrade cycle device. I don’t expect the hardware to last 7+ years like normal console lifecycles but I’m very glad to hear they’re being patient and aggressively supporting the software side.

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 33 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I dunno, I expect the Deck to last far longer than the average console if anything. It's a PC, so the games are pretty much guaranteed to keep coming for decades to come, as they have for decades past.

The hardware will fall behind, so I think the point where the newest Triple A games won't be playable will come within a few years, but I bet whatever visual novels or pixelated indie games release in 2035 will still run just fine on it.

Plus, it's designed to be repairable, unlike most consoles. And even if Valve stops maintaining SteamOS for the Steam Deck, you'll still be able to install other distros, so software support isn't something I'm very concerned about either.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Two thoughts.

  1. Space marine 2 didn't work well so I'm assuming that spankin new games will be hit or miss from here on out.
  2. AAA games have sucked lately. ive played so many good games on my deck that I may have missed on a larger system.
[–] xChronoZerox@lemmy.today 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

It 100% could, everyone thinks they need to be able to generate kratos' abs, Cloud's spikes and Keanu....but they don't. (Removed an extra an)

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Agreed. FSR 3 really is amazing and I'd gladly use that to pull a few more years of playing my favorite games on 720p low.

Upscalers are great for portables I just hope it's not used to excuse poor optimization.

That said I only play fps on my desktop, the steam deck opens up an entirely different class of games for me.

[–] KeefChief13@lemmy.world 52 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

It's kind of just becoming an indie or old game portable pc to me. Don't personally have much interest in playing modern graphically demanding titles on it.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

It's an excellent thin client as well. I've played the second half of death stranding through the free tier of Geforce Now.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 11 points 16 hours ago

I'm the same. I play retro and indie titles on the Deck, and more modern and demanding games on the desktop.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 6 points 16 hours ago

I was really surprised how well Hellblade 2 ran on mine. And supposedly Until Dawn also runs well now. When you can live with 30fps I suspect that well crafted games will be playable for a few more years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Shoot. My back log on games is so big, I can be happy with this one for another 5 years before I'd need something with more power.

Yeah same. I got a steam deck maybe six months ago, my backlog is so big I've only recently finished bioshock. Seems like a nifty little device and it seems to handle contemporary stuff okay too.

[–] Messier43@beehaw.org 1 points 8 hours ago

Or any new game :D

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

There are a ton of PC gamers who think the only way to play a video game is 1440p 60-144fps and anything below that is unplayable. The reality is the steam deck is a 720p 30fps handheld device that can occasionally make it to 60fps if pushed far enough.

IMHO a device that can run a game like God of war Ragnarok at 30fps in handheld mode and still play fine when docked is succeeding on the performance front in several aspects. In comparison, the switch version of Wolfenstein the new Colossus had to remove entire sets of geometry to even hit 30fps where the deck can hit that easily with the same settings without removing geometry and using AMD FSR. I think the deck has at least 3 more years in it before we even start to see any needed upgrades at that performance. Only time will tell.

[–] daellat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Yes but that 1440p 144hz is on a 27 inch display on a stationary computer. Why do you think people that prefer that are mutually exclusive with people that are fine with less for a mobile device with a 7 inch display and a battery?

[–] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yeah, this is my take at it as well. Sure, your big beefy PC looks better, but can you play CP2077 at 30,000 feet on a transatlantic flight? Because I have!

Performance could definitely be better. It would be great if the deck could reliably push 720p 60fps all the time, and maybe some day we'll get there. But for the moment my deck can push most of the games I throw at it to at least 40 fps, and it can hold 45 decently enough, and that's good enough for me.

I play during lunch at work, when I go shopping with the wife, family holiday when nothing is going on, busses, waiting for Dr. appointments, the train, all kinds of places. My steam deck opened up gaming to me by making it available in small pockets of otherwise unused time.

[–] MXX53@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The steamdeck seriously changed my perspective of what power I need for a computer and convinced me that I can continue to run my 1080ti for at least a few more years.

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

1080'ties really were legendary cards. Back then I only had a 1060ti as my prior card broke unexpectedly and that was all the money I could spare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 89 points 19 hours ago

Good. Keeping it the same means that the original Steam Deck will remain a target device for game developers for longer.

[–] turtlepower@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The one "generational leap" I want, and have wanted for decades, is the ability to upgrade hardware, like modular laptops can. It's great that they aren't doing little incremental upgrades, but between generations, games come out that would work but need a little more RAM or something, and instead of having to wait another 2 years and spending $1000 on a new console when it comes out, you could just shove more RAM in it in the meantime.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Never in my life have I regretted putting more RAM into my computers. When faced with deciding between similarly priced graphics cards going with the higher RAM option was always the right choice in the long run. Because higher resolution textures always make an otherwise low game look great.

If I knew an adventurous spirit with great soldering skills and greater insurance I would go for the 32 GB upgrade on my Deck.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I bought the parts for that, install pending time off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Main downside is that having swappable components adds size and cost, which is why laptops are so much less modular than full size PCs. For something like the Deck, which is trying to be as small and cheap as possible, I doubt we'll see anything modular for a long time.

Valve could possibly sell upgraded motherboards that you could use with your original screen/etc. However before ifixit sold deck parts, there was a leak of the upcoming parts and prices. At the time, replacement motherboards were planned to be sold, but they planned to sell the motherboard for $350 (when the cheapest deck was $400). Ultimately they ended up never selling the motherboard, which makes sense when considering how expensive it was compared to the overall price of the unit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›