this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
353 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 118 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Endorse Harris, Christie, or you're still carrying water for Trump.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As if that would do any good. Democrats need to stop trotting out Republicans.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Republicans are quick to dismiss their own in a heartbeat if they turn on the fuhrer. Most of them don't give a shit about Christie anymore anyway

[–] Furball@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Him endorsing Harris could convince a couple Pennsylvania voters near the New Jersey border, and in an election as close as this that would be major

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Chris Christie still has a lot of sway with his Republican base.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Many Trump supporters do it because they are part of that herd.

They will follow the pack if momentum changes.

What is there to lose anyway?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What is there to lose anyway?

The votes of stupid people who think that if a monster endorses your candidate against a Kaiju, clearly the monster and your candidate have the same views.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

So you are saying that there are a significant number of left leaning voters that are so stupid that they are both engaged enough to understand who Chris Christie is and do not understand that Donald Trump is out to destroy everything that they believe and hold dear.

I don’t buy it

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

To be fair, I listen to a lot of Republicans like Cassidy Hutchinson, Steve Schmidt , George Conway, Michael Cohen, Liz Cheney, John Kelly and The Bulwark because they are insiders who actually know what when on in the White House.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 60 points 3 days ago

Alternate headline: Former Asshole Governor, No Longer Governor, Attempts to Stay Relevant by Pointing Out Other Assholes' Obvious Flaws

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 36 points 2 days ago

If I wanted to hear an old, stupid, racist cunt I would listen to my grandmother. It’s the same speech every time. Good riddance to their generation.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 days ago

Trump rambling about Bidens "circles" today. What the Fuck is that even.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If Trump loses he WILL run again in 2028. Even at 82. And I don't think we're lucky enough to have him drop dead by then

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh I highly doubt that. If he loses, it’s open season on his criminal activity. And his list of criminal activities grows seemingly daily. He’ll be disqualified, or he’ll be in prison.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Let me introduce you to a little something called SCOTUS and its oligarch-bought majority

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

lol…. Okay.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's so weird hearing Americans talk like they've never watched a movie in their entire lives.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think we've seen enough to prove he'll never go to prison or likely ever see serious consequences to anything

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again, that’s because he’s protected as a presidential candidate. If he loses- the gloves are off.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

If you were right, he would have been in prison in 2022.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Even worse, the republicans will turn on him.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately I don't think there was much there in the mental department to begin with and his base voted for him anyway in both 2016 and 2020.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At 78, Trump is now the oldest presidential candidate in American history. If elected, he would be 82 years old when he leaves the White House.

I'm sorry, did Biden's campaign not happen? I mean, he was in the race four months ago.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Biden was never an officially nominated candidate.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I don't think Biden was ever elected the official candidate but I could be wrong