this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
223 points (87.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29422 readers
381 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago

Don't call it anything. Ignore it and maybe it will go away.

[–] Furball@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, it’s not like twitter was ever a beacon of glory, pre-Elon twitter was still twitter

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Twitter was a turd. X is a turd marinaded in diarrhea sauce.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Such poetry. It brings a tear to my eye

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Ok well maybe a beacon of glory is a bit out there for Twitter, but there was a time where it was actually cool and unique.

Like back in the day where you could interact with it over plain SMS lol

I feel old.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Xitter (pronounced shitter)

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (10 children)
[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Surp@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry twitter was always trash

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It really is saying something that it's waaay worse now.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's not like it was a hostile take over. They played their part when Musk talked shit and they sued him to follow through with the purchase. They could have easily kept it, but they wanted the money instead.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not that they are blameless - far from it - but they had a fiduciary responsibility to pursue the deal because it was good for their shareholders

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

"Fiduciary duty to get profit" is a libertarian myth. It has no legal basis.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It’s a myth so widely pushed and accepted over the decades that just calling it a myth won’t be accepted as an argument against it at this point.

What I think is interesting is that this sense of fiduciary duty can be used by a company to do whatever they want. Mass layoffs are part of a fiduciary duty to cut costs. Mass hirings are part of a fiduciary duty to expand operations for growth. At this point it’s less a myth and more an excuse for doing whatever.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Twitter has never, even dating back to it's inception, never ever ever turned a profit. The whole reason Elon mockingly offered to buy it was because they were looking for, and struggling to find, a buyer. They just wanted to break even and walk away.

Instead Elon was like "Hur dur I got 43 billion for ya!" And Twitter was like "SOLD! No takesies backsies!". And Elon was like "Wait, wut?"

And then Elon carried a sink through the lobby in protest.

[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was a public company, the shareholders would've sued them, no?

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

OP might be talking about the user base, not the owners.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

There is simple solution: just ignore it. Don't refer to it in any way.

[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 26 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Hey, don't rewrite history - twitter was always notoriously bad, under Elon it surely got even worse though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

For me, it’s simpler than that: I’m gonna deadname his company as long as he keeps deadnaming his daughter

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But Twitter has always been shit.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not really. It was fun to talk to people that you barely knew. It was kinda like a hybrid of a chatroom and a forum.

But it grew to become shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 17 points 1 week ago

They have $44 billion dollar bills to wipe away the tears.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

People now have fond memories of twitter? Insane.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't understand why anyone would care this much about a social media website

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

They don’t. Rather, they believe that others do, so posts like this are simply signaling alliance.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

Those people sold it to musk. They were tech bros whose goal from the start was to get a massive buyout and bail. They don't deserve your respect anymore than musk does.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Previously, it was a shithole.
Now, it's a Nazi shithole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The way I look at it, if Elon Musk is gonna deadname his own child, I'm sure as shit gonna deadname the corporation he tanked

[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

The following is a tremendously disproportionate analogy given that we're talking about a microblogging website, but I really don't think there's any better term for it:

It's really less like you're calling Twitter by its deadname and more like you're refusing to call it by its slave name. Twitter didn't come up with this on its own, some guy just rolled up and said "I'm changing your name because yours isn't cool enough." Like, fukken Kunta Kinte.

Again, very unfortunate that that's the only comparison that comes to mind but I'm really blanking on anything else. Jean Valjean, I guess. Maybe Darth Vader. Locutus of Borg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] calabast@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, what you personally call it isn't really going to make any difference, so if we're trying to optimize your mental health, just reframe the naritive in your head. You're still calling it Twitter to honor what it used to be, back when you respected it. You are refusing to acknowledge the nazi dumpster fire it has become, even if you still need to talk about it.

I personally basically never have a reason to mention the site when taking to another person, but if/when I do, I'll call it Twitter just because I think it would annoy Elon, if he somehow knew.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

"X" in Chinese is pronounced "sh", so I approve.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

We should call it "X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter." Every time. Yes it sounds ridiculous, because it is.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Twitter is gone. It died the day Elon fired most of its staff.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I have despised twitter since basically its inception.

  1. The character (original) character limit fundamentally means you are strongly encouraged to limit conversation to basically soundbites, slogans, and pithy comments. Even though this was changed later, it still created a culture that generally mocks anything long winded.

While its true that brevity is the soul of wit, wit is not the same thing as a detailed and nuanced discussion of a complex topic.

It thus lends itself to being an optimal tool for political slogans, celebrity gossip, and direct corporate advertisement.

  1. Twitter is far, far, faaar too open ended, as in one to many kind of network connections. Its a dream come true also for narcissistic, attention seeking individuals who want to win Twitter.

  2. Twitter blew up before Facebook completely shifted (enshittified?) their entire model from being focused on actually connecting friend groups, and directly pushed Facebook toward just being an unmitigated firehose of 'content' from every which way, which just became the norm for 'social media' design.

Of course X now is even fucking worse, but I am so glad its dying.

The way I see it, Twitter contributed heavily toward destroying the older, more personal formats of social media, it helped destroy the old forum culture of the net where people had communities and a measure of intellect, privacy and respect.

It took the sincerity out of online discourse, and was foundational in shifting the internet from a 'place' with lots of weird locales, into some kind of Eldritch god's sick joke of a species level omni-mirror, reducing online humanity to a popularity contest of political slogans, narcissistic clout chasers, gossip mongers, and corporate sloganeering and brand worship... and giving all of this to us in an undifferentiated constant flow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I mean lets not overdo it the algorithms were becoming very trash before it was bought up but it was usable. Peak twitter was like 2017

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Twitter was no better than x lol

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I hadn't been there in a long while, but a friend sent a link to what he said was a funny tweet. It was, but the responses were just awful, and they all had blue checkmarks.

Every single inserted ad was for right-wing grifts (crypto, t-shirts, gold coins, etc) or awful right-wing politicians looking angry or posing with guns.

Noped right out.

I pointed it out to my wife, but she says the journalists she follows are still all there. 🤷🏻‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›