this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
208 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2216 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 months ago

Can't wait for his photos in drag to surface 🙄

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (5 children)

How do we the people legally defend our freedom against all of these billionaires dumping cash into the dark side? Wealth is being used as a weapon and it is resulting in real negative implications in our lives. Some of these guys are literally buying down your quality of life.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The real answer is you tear down Citizens United and make lobbying defined as the bribery that it is, then cap political campaign donations at 2k max from all sources. If that doesnt work, we revert to violence. The wealthy tend to stop fucking around when all their friends are getting bonked.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

also: force political non profits to higher levels of disclosure. lets see some of those internal federalist society emails.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We need to push for campaign finance reform and we need to continue to draw attention to billionaires and corporations that are dumping piles of money into buying elections.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good luck with that, considering the Tribunal of Six is fully committed to the idea that money is speech, despite the fact that it is absolutely nothing of the sort.

Thankfully, the Tribunal of Six also thinks entrenching our right to firearms is a great idea, so do with that what you will.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What else can you do? You fight for it and draw awareness to the problem, or you give up and let the oligarchs take over more.

Or things get so bad and authoritarian that that whole second amendment thing starts to get used in the context of the original intent for which it was written.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago

Wealth is always a weapon, this is why we need economic change. No individuals should wield so much power

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just start murdering billionaires. Easy.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the only answer that will actually work. No one inside politics wants to restrict the amount of money they csn receive. Until we force consequences on the rich, they wont suffer any.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

People always forget what the good old days are.

The good old days are back when if a boss took advantage of his employees and fucked them over too hard, the employees would just drag mr. Bossman out of his house and beat him to death in front of his family.

Maybe his brother who takes over the business will get the hint to not fuck over those who actually run the companies.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 2 months ago

“Expect us to increase support for organizations that call out companies and financial institutions that bend to the woke mind virus

That shit is so 2022. Get outta here.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I have 1B to give to people to spend on evil messaging and research of crap that hurts others.

That 1B is allergic to helping people, fixing systemic issues, and truly making America great by elevating those that actually need it. So I must keep it in my pocketses.

/s

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

If there's any better proof you need to prove that obscene amounts of wealth really fuck your mindset up enough to make you go against your fellow humans, look at the assholes finding the GOP.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Guy is a whack job, but is also seemingly living in an incredible amount of denial.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not in denial, I'm sure he knows exactly how much power he has. They just have to keep playing the victim to keep their base afraid enough to keep voting their way.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did you read his quote though? He's under the assumption that somehow the politics push society to act a certain way, and not the other way around.

He's woefully out of touch and in complete denial thinking his money is going to sway what have become societal norms in the US.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's been successful so far in executing his plan. The supreme court locked in for pretty much a generation, legalised corruption, made abortion illegal in some states again, etc. And it's basically a coin flip whether he can do more after the election because somehow it's a close election between Trump + project 2025 and the alternative.

These guys are dangerous, and shouldn't be dismissed as delusional.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I would argue that is subverting the will of the people by exploiting the system which is not what he's saying here. It's obvious he thinks that whomever is in positions of power can influence the general wishes of a population simply by existing and parroting their positions with enough repetition, which is categorically untrue and been proven so throughout history (even recently) over and over again.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, our society is so progressive we could never backslide to the point that abortion is illegal or anything.

Beside that, if he's throwing around billions, he's likely most interested in economic issues like unions and worker protections.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You're mistaking the levers of power at work with the actual societal norms/wants/wishes.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago

He's a rich fascist and a threat to life on this planet.

I don't care to analyze more deeply than that.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Find me a single leftist in corporate media. Even MSNBC is heavily anti-bernie.

The reason media tends slightly from furthest right possible is they don't want to pay defamation lawsuits so they do the barest possible investigation to cover their ass. Consider that a significant portion of the US corporate media revere republicans despite knowing every time they've lied, how and why.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Even MSNBC is heavily anti-bernie.

They called Sanders' supporters "brownshirts," a word they refrained from using to describe the January 6 insurrectionists.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dominance of fucking what?

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

This man is a serious threat to democracy.

I hope all terrorists get what they deserve.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Liberals suffer from the "woke mind virus"? Conservatives suffer from the "weird mind virus". This mother fucker looks like Hans Moleman from the Simpsons.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Woke mind virus = People should share my own disgusting backwards opinions so I feel less weird.

[–] Daikusa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You do Hans a disservice.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

It's weird how words come around again. I'm sure he meant this in the American liberal v conservative context, but it also works in the old meaning of liberal in the sense of "people who don't want a king"...

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I very much look forward to reading this scumbag's obituary.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Ironic that these guys all are worried about the "woke mind virus" when they all have neurosyphilis.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I pledge $5 to hire a 'liberal dom to crush his balls'.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Nice complex plan, trove of connections, and absurd wealth. This here's a pistol."