this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
384 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16522 readers
905 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themoken@startrek.website 119 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (46 children)

Couldn't agree more πŸ˜…

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, I'm getting tired of everyone and their cat saying shit like "AI will...".

With how loosely defined "AI" is, it probably will at some point. But that statement is also completely worthless.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

This has been bothering me too. Its such a nothing statement with no suggestion of how this would be accomplished behind it. Like sure, technology is likely to continue advancing, but it may not even resemble these current implementations by the time we get there.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's impressive how many Ls one man can take while still getting media coverage

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When an AI is able to take and write every single line of code, generate all the art, and debug it just by having someone as code dumb as a CEO type in a prompt, I'll believe his words and eat my shirt.

[–] mutant_zz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The thing is even if AI could do all that (which is doubtful in my life time), you would still need someone to prompt it with something interesting. And CEO types have never had an interesting idea in their lives

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And all they'll have to show for it is a mediocre pile of garbage

Oh my god. Bethesda is Skynet!

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Man I thought he got better after he admitted that NFTs were a mistake, he can't help himself.

What a shame, I was ready to forgive the dude and play Masters of Albion, I loved black & white and there aren't any clones of it.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

He always apologizes before pushing his next scam.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a source port of Black and White that is in early development. Just had it's first alpha release.

So there might be a modern way to play it in a year or two. Hopefully modding too!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Bro still out here overhyping, he can't help himself.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

you guys joke but AI npcs have the potential of being awesome

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A really good place would be background banter. Greatly reducing the amount of extra dialogues the devs will have to think of.

  1. Give the AI a proper scenario, with some Game lore based context, applicable to each background character.
  2. Make them talk to each other for around 5-10 rounds of conversation.
  3. Read them, just to make sure nothing seems out of place.
  4. Bundle them with TTS for each character sound type.

Sure, you'll have to make a TTS package for each voice, but at the same time, that can be licensed directly by the VA to the game studio, on a per-title basis and they too, can then get more $$$ for less work.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

they too, can then get more $$$ for less work.

I'm pretty sure it'll be less money for less work, at least after the first few titles. Companies really don't like paying more than they have to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They won't because of hallucinations. They could work in mature games though where its expected that whatever the AI says is not going to break your brain.

But yeah a kid walks up to toad in the next Mario game and toad tells Mario to go slap peaches ass, that game would get pulled really quick.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 10 points 1 month ago (19 children)

I just re-read my comment and realised I was not clear enough.
You bundle the text and the AI-TTS. Not the AI text generator.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] cheddar@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh come on, LLMs don't hallucinate 24/7. For that, you have to ask a chatbot to say something it wasn't properly trained for. But generating simple texts for background chatter? That's safe and easy. The real issue is the amount of resources required by modern LLMs. But technologies tend to become better with time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There is a possibility something like this will be possible in the future, but it's not going to be an achievement of AI, it's largely going to be the achievement of regular developers creating a general-purpose game engine that can be used to put together a game block by block, which can be utilized by both human game designers and AI. (Likely to better effect by the former.) I can imagine Entity Component Systems will play a big part of that.

One of the biggest blockers for AI making games is going to be testing it to select for better performance. With text it's relatively easy to see if some text an AI produced is plausible. Images are also plentiful, but that's a lot more subjective. With both of these it would also not take a massive amount of time to add a human element. It's quick to check if a paragraph or image looks like it is a good response to the input promt. A game, however? How long do you need to play it to see if it's fun? At best, perhaps, you can write an AI to control a bot character to see if it's technically playable.

I don't want to even think about the electricity that wlll be wasted training such models.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Grifter gonna grift.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Who is still giving this man money?

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

25 years might actually be a potentially realistic timeframe for that. But I'd still bet on a little longer myself. I hope it happens within my lifetime.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is one of the best titles in a long time.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Honestly I didn't even read the article. Shared it purely based on the headline.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 8 points 1 month ago

Capitalists don’t know shit about what the working class wants. These video game folks continue to prove this true.

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

This lifelong grifter has embraced AI? Shocker.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί