this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
917 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
2892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 156 points 2 months ago (7 children)

RX 7900 XTX is better because it has more x

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 197 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 78 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The best thing about this is that it's also on the x-axis.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And they validated this data 4 times. It's really good data.

[–] prayer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Actually, they only validated up to 4xs in the product name, so take the 5x result with a grain of salt, one of the Xs aren't validated.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago

"Thanks Steve."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 59 points 2 months ago

X is deprecated. Use the RWayland 7900 WaylandTWayland instead.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's 50% more Xs ! You can beat this deal !

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This bad boy can fit so many X's in it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But what about the xXx_RX_7900_xXx?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 14 points 2 months ago

But X is bad, as proved by Elon Musk - so it should be the other way around.

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That X is twice as much vram, which funny enough, is great for running ai models

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 86 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I switched to duckduckgo before this bullshit, but this would 100% make me switch if I hadn't already.

Who wants random ai gibberish to be the first thing they see?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If search engines don’t improve to address the AI problem, most of the Internet will be AI gibberish.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I think that ship has sailed

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

The internet as we knew it is doomed to be full of ai garbage. It's a signal to noise ratio issue. It's also part of the reason the fediverse and smaller moderated interconnected communities are so important: it keeps users more honest by making moderators more common and, if you want to, you can strictly moderate against AI generated content.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

DuckDuckGo started showing AI results for me.

I think it uses the bing engine iirc.

Sure, but it's trivial to turn it off. While you're there, also turn off ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like the advice you'd get in the first three comments asking a question on Reddit.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder where they trained the AI model to answer such a question lol.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Don't forget the glue on the pizza

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A.I. or Assumed Intelligence

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty much it. It just assumes what the next word should be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Its not artificial intelligence, its artificial idiocy

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Nah. It's real idiocy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Here is what kagi delivers with the same prompt:

NB: quick answer is only generated when ending your search with a question mark

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Problem is, you cannot trust it's not hallucinating these stats

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And even if it's showing the correct number, you can't be sure how trustworthy the source is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

At least it's citing sources and you can check to make sure. And from my anecdotal evidence it has been pretty good so far. It also told me on some occasions that the queried information was not found in it's sources instead of just making something up. But it's not perfect for sure, it's always better to do manual research but for a first impression and to find some entry points I've found it useful so far

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it's not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn't gain anything from the genai

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That being said, I can't trust MKBHD is not hallucinating either.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

its not completely useless... i only asked copilot one thing and it worked; 'how do i remove or completely disable copilot'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago

Well, I'm sated.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

7900 XTX; more powerful, therefore better.

7900 XT; cheaper, therefore better.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It goes without saying that this shit doesn't really understand what's outputting; it's picking words together and parsing a grammatically coherent whole, with barely any regard to semantics (meaning).

It should not be trying to provide you info directly, it should be showing you where to find it. For example, linking this or this*.

To add injury in this case it isn't even providing you info, it's bossing you around. Typical Microsoft "don't inform a user, tell it [yes, "it"] what it should be doing" mindset. Specially bad in this case because cost vs. benefit varies a fair bit depending on where you are, often there's no single "right" answer.

*OP, check those two links, they might be useful for you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

ChatGPT4o can do some impressive and useful things. Here, Im just sending it a mediocre photo of a product with no other context, I didnt type a question. First, its identifying the subject, a drink can. Then its identifying the language used. Then its assuming I want to know about the product so its translating the text without being asked, because it knows I only read english. Then its providing background and also explaining what tamarind is and how it tastes. This is enough for me to make a fully informed decision. Google translate would require me to type the text in, and then would only translate without giving other useful info.

It was delicious.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Google: ok so the AI in search results is a good thing, got it!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 14 points 2 months ago

At the very least it failed in a way that's obvious by giving you contradictory statements. If it left you with only the wrong statements, that's when "AI" becomes really insidiuos.

[–] neo@lemmy.hacktheplanet.be 13 points 2 months ago

I checked it, it’s true. Side note: it’s “the saté of AI.” FTFY. From what I’ve heard it’s even better than 🍿to sit back and watch this farce unfold.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

SearXNG only returns results search engines agree on. That removes ads and this bullshit

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not useless, it's saying you can't afford the better quality product you dirty, dirty poor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Am i guessing it right that the XTX uses 50% more energy for the 20% more power?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That's generally how it goes at the very top of capacity yes.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›