Technology

59641 readers

2685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

917

Ladies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI. (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by Alpha71@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

At least it's citing sources and you can check to make sure. And from my anecdotal evidence it has been pretty good so far. It also told me on some occasions that the queried information was not found in it's sources instead of just making something up. But it's not perfect for sure, it's always better to do manual research but for a first impression and to find some entry points I've found it useful so far

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it's not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn't gain anything from the genai

[–] wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As I said the links provide some entry points for further research. It's providing some use to me because I don't need to check every search result. But to each their own and I understand the general scepticism of generative "AI"

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If you don't check everyone source. It might be just bullshitting you. There's people who followed your approach and got into hot shit with their bosses and judges

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

There is absolutely value in something compiling sources for you to personally review. Anyone who cannot use AI efficiently is analogous to someone who can't see the utility in a graphing calculator. It's not magic, it's a tool. And tools need to be used precisely, and for appropriate purposes.

My plumber fucks up I don't blame his wrench. My lawyers don't vet their case work, I blame them.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

The sources are the same result of the search? Or at least the top results?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

When I query an AI I always end with "provide sources and bibliography for your reply". That seems to get better replies.