this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
90 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

48371 readers
1733 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been happily Windows-free for about 5 years, but lately I need some Win-only software including a few games that don't work at all on Linux. My main questions:

  • How to avoid Windows messing with my Linux install? Having a separate PC is not possible for me right now. I'm considering uninstalling grub and instead selecting the boot device I want from UEFI, idk if this is advisable though.

  • I'm also interested in how to get a Windows install that's as minimal as possible: I don't want to log in to a Microsoft account, I don't want telemetry etc, I only want whatever is strictly required to make my system functional. The one thing I do want is Windows Defender cause ain't no way I'm dealing with an antivirus.

  • Should I go for Win 11 or stick to 10?

Any tips or experiences are welcome!

Ps: I know this information is probably all out there, but I thought a post in this community about it would be useful for others as well.

UPDATE: I ended up going with a regular old dual boot using Windows 10 iot LTSC - there's a few games I wanted to run and a driver as well so I chose to install directly on hardware as opposed to a VM. I created the install media using Ventoy, and UNPLUGGED EVERY OTHER DRIVE during installation except the one Windows was supposed to come on. Afterwards I had to boot in with a live Linux USB (the nice thing about Ventoy is that you can write multiple ISOs to your USB so it came in handy) to manually install rEFInd onto the original EFI partition that my Linux install uses, then I just had to set up the correct boot order in UEFI and everything is working. I also had to fuck around on the boot partition and with efibootmgr to remove all traces of grub so things don't get tangled up which was a bit scary but things are working perfectly now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Two physical drives. Install windows first in one, then Linux on the other. If you don't do this order windows boot manager will take over and you'll have to boot Linux from bios.

[–] Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not using dual boot anymore, but when I did, I always selected the partition from BIOS, which was totally fine for me. Are there arguments against it?

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Only an issue if you don't disable fast shutdown on Windows. A hibernated system might get surprised if another OS moves files about while it was asleep.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Will it maybe work if I just unplug my Linux drive during the Win install?

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd recommend having the Linux drive unplugged during the windows installation. Windows, for some reason, will install the boot loader in an entirely different drive than what you selected. There's no question or prompt to prevent this. The only way to easily prevent this is to just have the one drive plugged in.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I had to disconnect all my SATA HDs to stop the Windows installer from shitting all over them.

I'd be worried about Windows updates doing the same thing now, after the the recent glitch that broke bootloaders.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

It's common for windows updates to delete boot parts or Linux, corrupt grub, etc. That is only when windows and Linux are installed on the same drive together. I have yet to see Windows corruping Linux on a separate drive entirely. Never happened to me despite how much I ~~mess up my grub updates~~ distro hop.

[–] hades@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One problem with that is that you will end up with two EFI partitions. This is not supported very well by anything, really, so you will run the risk of Windows messing with the wrong partition anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one 3 points 2 months ago

Yep, dual disks with the Windows installation done first is how I did/do it. GRUB/systemd-boot worked just fine from then on, and I am not on Windows 11, so I didn't get hit with that fuck-up Microsoft did just a few days ago.

[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My aproach was to use two drives. I had Windows on the first, then disconected it and installed Linux on the second. That way I dont have grub and use F11 to open the bios bootloader to select the system I want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

I also recommend rEFInd for the bootloader if you don't want to set anything up (and risk messing up). You don't need to configure your boot entries, it scans for boot options and shows them with a graphical interface, so your Linux and Windows should just show up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

My first line of investigation here would be virtualization. It will solve the "don't mess with my Linux install" problem and will let you use the windows apps you need at the same time as the Linux apps you normally use. Also VMs have all their other useful features like snapshots and portability.

I did this in the distant past and it was quite convenient having the VM instead of a dual boot.

[–] SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, VMs are a good route since the OP didn't mention gaming.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I should have, gonna edit the post

[–] IzzyChambers@social.vivaldi.net 2 points 2 months ago

@friend_of_satan @recarsion yes, I’ve been using Windows 11 as a guest OS in VirtualBox for two months, after I switched to Linux as my main OS. I like it much more than dual booting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

If you insist on dual-boot: two separate physical drives.

Otherwise: use linux with a windows vm.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One thing I've been trying lately that's a bit different: I happen to have an old SSD that had an enclosure with it (kind of like this) which essentially turns it into an external USB drive.

I then used Rufus to install Windows on that drive, using the "Windows To Go" option and also checking the option to not allow Windows to access the internal drives. That way, my laptop can just happily run Linux by itself, and if I need to use Windows for anything I can just plug the drive in, hit F12 on boot and choose to boot from that drive instead. The added bonus is that Windows also can't mess with anything on my regular system or monkey about with the boot loader.

I've only had it on there for about a week but it seems to be working perfectly fine so far!

Oh and also Rufus gives you the option to start with a local account already set up, so you don't have to do the MS online account bullshit. And then after install I used ShutUp10 to turn off as much telemetry as I could.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

Hm this sounds very interesting, it would be pretty convenient, I'll look into it

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago

The most painless way to dual-boot is to install something that's not Windows alongside something else that's not Windows.

[–] Quintus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

I would recommend going for the IoT LTSC versions of Windows.

https://massgrave.dev/windows_ltsc_links

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Get 16gb of ram and CPU less than 5 years old.

  2. Install Windows 11 in a VM

  3. Install the virtio drivers from the Fedora project link

  4. Profit

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How good are the virtio GPU drivers?

I’ve only really messed with them on servers with their ancient ass GPUs from like the early 2000s. Back in 2015 I remember running GTA 5 on a 2013 iMac with iris pro. In windows I got 30+ gps at 1080p, and through parallels I got about the same FPS at 720p.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Is there a reason you need a dual book instance instead of a VM or even WINE?

Unless you need direct access to hardware and if you have enough RAM, you can probably avoid dual booting altogether.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Balinares@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

The default actually works pretty well these days.

Messing with the EFI partition, for instance by attempting to have two of those on separate disks, will probably cause you more pain than Windows will. As far as I understand, only one EFI partition can be configured in BIOS as the boot partition, so you will have to change the configuration in BIOS whenever you want to boot to the other OS.

Windows does have a history of changing the default EFI bootloader once in a while; however your chosen bootloader is still there, just not marked as the default anymore. A Windows app like EasyUEFI will let you change the default back.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Swappable hard drives

I have a ThinkPad with easy access to the hard drive. It's one screw, remove a small panel and slide out the hard drive, slide in a new hard drive and reinstall the panel and screw. It all takes about a minute.

I have a drive for my Linux setup and another for windows.

I gave up setting up dual boot setups because I'm not as skilled or capable and I've lost entire setups in the past due to updates and changes and it was constantly frustrating for me. So I figured that just swapping hard drives was the easiest for me. No configuration, no changes and neither OS can interfere with one another.

I use my Linux as my daily driver for everything and windows when I need something from windows. I only ever use windows maybe once a month or once every second month. I spend more time regularly updating windows than in actually using it.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

Like others have said, I just use two drives, and I can boot into Windows with GRUB.

However, these days, I just do a VM with GPU passthrough. (I installed a second graphics card in my PC just for this.)

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Windows doesn't mess with the Linux install anymore, that was with BIOS boot. Just make sure the EFI partition is big enough so you can fit both.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Does it not? I've seen posts about grub being borked after Windows updates, or was that only on legacy BIOS systems?

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

can report UEFI installs of PopOS and Mint were recently borked by a Win11 update.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

As far as I know, that only stops out of date versions of grub that have a certain vulnerability from running that would allow escaping Secure Boot. Meh. It doesn't touch any Linux files or anything and you can boot if you turn off Secure Boot so you can fix it. Long shot from what used to happen where you could only have one boot loader installed at a time so installing Windows would wipe what was there before.

(and by fix it I mean replace grub with systemd-boot)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Not true as of late

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If by "these days" you mean a motherboard that supports UEFI, then it honestly doesn't matter anymore. Your board controls the boot order, and there isn't an MBR for Windows to mess with anymore. Just plan out your partitioning careful before hand, and if you plan on using a lot of files in both OS's, make a plain storage partition that is easily mounted under Windows (NTFS does not count).

Honestly, aside from a very scant number of apps or games, there isn't a real need to dual boot anymore. If you can't run something under Proton or Wine, having a Windows VM will get the job done.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

NTFS does not count

Aren't NTFS and exFAT pretty much the only option?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I put windows 11 live on a £20 USB drive, and it hasn't messed with my Linux install at all

[–] Kekin@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago

Getting a second drive just for windows I think is a good approach. If you were to do so, it's important that you remove all other drives while installing windows, otherwise the Windows installer will put its boot files into whatever existing EFI partition it finds.

Then using something like https://github.com/Raphire/Win11Debloat you should be good to go with a relatively clean setup.

To have a local account, I use Rufus to setup the usb installer in a way that it automatically creates the local account, and it can also disable the secure boot and tpm requirements from the installer if you want. Though I think rufus is a windows program only. I know there's the "OOBE" approach for the local account, but I haven't done that before. That could be an option too

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I added a second SSD to my windows laptop and installed Linux on it. I configured the BIOS to boot from this second SSD. Painless!

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If your windows software works in a vm or wine then that might be a better choice for you.

The only thing windows will do with to a Linux install anymore is mess up the boot. People still say two separate drives is the optimal choice to prevent this but it really doesn’t save you from anything but fat fingering your own partitions during the install process and if the disks are the same size/interface/manufacturer it doesn’t do much there either.

So as has always been the case since dual booting existed: install windows first, saving the space you want to use for Linux then install whatever you want. Have your distributions preferred method of repairing failed boot on hand so that when something breaks unexpectedly you can fix it. Often it’s more than a boot repair tool, but an entire bootable environment that can be used for all kinds of purposes.

Use uup dump and rufus to make a windows installer and put it on a usb. I specifically recommend rufus as opposed to dd or other normal way of doing things because it has special options regarding windows oobe and requirements that will be invoked on use.

It doesn’t matter if you choose 10 or 11. Both can be had in ltsc channels. Dealers choice, you’re the one with software that needs it!

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

a bootable removable medium that can display and chainload all the installed OSes

[–] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago

Might as well go for Win11, you're going to have to deal with it next year anyways.

Windows doesn't do minimal, it does whatever the hell it wants. There are some OOBE tricks to get a local account working.

I have used the privacy.sexy app to strip down some of the most obnoxious Win11 bits - be warned that you have to disable defender to have it work. Is it doing bad things? Is MS doing incredibly shady shit with their detections? Who's to say? When I turn on Defender afterwards, everything seems "fine".

There's no need to get rid of grub, or play games with different boot drives. Get to know how EFI works. Look at efibootmgr's output - that's pretty much all that the firmware knows. The firmware has multiple entries consisting of a drive (magic device number), a program path (EFI\grub\grub_x64.efi), and maybe a string to pass along. There is a priority list (0003,0001,0002) which MS occasionally likes to re-arrange.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Using modern UEFI booting with a 1GB shared ESP and grub2 has worked just fine for me in the last 8 years. os-prober has always just found the Windows install and generated the necessary boot entry for grub. Windows has never trespassed into the Fedora or Ubuntu folder of the ESP as far as I can tell.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Tiny10 on a VM

I'm sluggishly in the middle of the same thing.

[–] Bisexual_Cookie@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

Letting windows install on its own drive by removing the linux drive (otherwise it will select that drives efi partition), I use systemd boot and I just copied the EFI/Microsoft folder from the windows drive efi partition to the linux efi partition systemd-boot will auto detect it. As for minimal, just use windows 10 ltsc, or windows education and use a debloater tool that is trustworthy (I like winutill).

[–] SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Others have answered your dual-booting question pretty well. However, along the lines of "minimal" Windows, it's not generally recommended to fuck with the system as that can break things. There are scripts that can strip a lot of the problems, though. I can't remember any off the top of my head.

As for not requiring an account, I have old ISOs of Win11 and Win10 where the unplugging my ethernet cable trick gets me around signing into a Microsoft account. Not sure if it works on the ISO you get from Microsoft now, however. And if you have built-in WiFi, I think there's a way to disable it in the command prompt before you install.

Edit: Win10 is going to hit EOL in the near future. I am going to use it until then. It's got a lot fewer concerns (for me) than Win11, unless Microsoft keeps filtering Win11 shit into it.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Having another PC with minimum requirements only for Windows?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I've got two separate drives. Linux Mint on an SSD and Windows 10 on an older, mechanical drive. Leave the Windows drive alone. Make the Linux drive the first drive in your BIOS boot order, with the option to boot to Windows as your second drive.

If your GRUB menu doesn't show the Windows drive yet, run "sudo update-grub" to detect it. When your reboot, the bootloader should show both options.

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As for the second question: Windows 11 IoT LTSC has yet to be mentioned here - the only things that can stop you from using it are legality and convenience.

I'm not sure if W10 has an IoT LTSC version, but W10 LTSC does exist.

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Windows on external USB drive, disconnected after each use

load more comments
view more: next ›