this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
113 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5150 readers
438 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] badmemes@feddit.de 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Next years are going to be really interesting considering we are inching closer to those deadlines that were once too far away to even care about every day,

And with the deadlines these lawsuits are probably getting more and more.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And no one in power realizes or cares about the danger we are in. If anyone actually cared we would have treated this like the threat to global civilization that it is not a far off mild annoyance.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Plenty of them know. But they're only able care about the next election, because if they don't, a party with simple solutions will decimate them at the ballot box. Not likely to be entirely a coincidence that pro-Russia politicians are also pro-fossil fuels, is it?

Look at the Netherlands. The Dutch government tried to do something about nitrogen. They'd waited too long, the courts got involved, so they had no choice. The result? A farmers protest party won the most seats in provincial elections, and now far right Wilders won big in the national elections. They're fans of coal and gas, not so much wind and solar. Joy!

Similar in in plenty of countries in Europe and the US.

Fun. Fun. Fun.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Humanity is acting like a 12 year old that was given an assignment 30 years ago to complete, and they still haven't aged and they still haven't done anything and now they're panicking about trying to show anything that they've done in all that time.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good thing Belgium has properly invested in its nuclear power plants, so it isn't forced to rely on plants that are now almost 50 years old, because it was blindingly obvious that it's not a good idea to rely on Russian gas. /s

[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

If there is a nuclear leak, rather than trying to block the leak, Belgian politicians will just argue for decades about ensuring a fair distribution of radioactive pollution between flemish and francophones (as they do with the dossier about the noise from brussels airport).

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Well if they order it. I'm sure it'll happen