So, the difference between these clowns and Rittenhouse is that he dared criticize President Convict himself while they're focusing on the Trump campaign team, which is why he got cancelled and they aren't so far. Even though if you think about it, criticizing his campaign is basically still just criticizing the man himself, since it's his team.
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
190 points (96.1% liked)
politics
19144 readers
3196 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It also normalizes the idea of some criticism of Trump within their circle. Historically, they've kind of given him an auora of being 100% perfect in every way
A tiny crack into that could expand to more (and hopefully it will)
A schism in the ism is all I need to jism.
You mean tough badass dude Kyle Ritte house...
No take backs...
Well, some take backs...
OK, full take back.
Yeah, logically you can't separate Trump's campaign from him.
If he's in control of it, his campaign mistakes are his own. If he's not in control of it, he's not even in control of his own presidential campaign and isn't taking control to correct it.
So either he's bad at running a campaign or he's bad at picking competent people to delegate it to.
Et tu, neo-facists?
Down with the trump campaign. He is a felon.
I'm glad the Democratic Party has found their footing for once around an inclusive message...
Because the Republican party is falling hard into a "no true MAGAtsman" trap. Guys like Fuentes are going to keep pushing their group to the fringe, and also for once Democrats aren't going to follow them in compromising lock-step.
Lol, yeah do what the white supremacist wants you to do. Fuckin idiots
To what end?
So they can say they abandoned the ship before he lost.
That way they seem like less of a loser themselves.
To expand on that, I think these are people looking to set themselves up for continued grifting in the post-Trump fascist movement. Being just critical enough “of the Trump campaign” now will allow them to say they jumped ship in August 2024 without actually committing to abandoning Trump until after the election. They want to be in a position to claim they were ahead of the curve due to their astute political acumen. But don’t want the short term fall out from actually doing it, nor the potential risk of being proven wrong in November.
It’s a transparent move, but it’ll be effective on the post-Trump MAGA base, as these are generally not bright people.
Excellent hand eye coordination, you hit the nail right on the head. That's exactly what they're trying to do: come out as a "winner" no matter what actually happens.
I'm not trying to be mean, but who cares?
If they wanna break the cult up I'm not gonna look a gift horse in the mouth.
Look, the fascists are having a barroom brawl. Pass the popcorn, would you?
These people haven't had an original thought in well over a decade. The dems make a radical shift in expected campaign activity and now the republicans want to change thing up, too.
The Washington Post on Sunday detailed how several far-right figures with large online followings—including white supremacist Nick Fuentes and activists Laura Loomer and Candace Owens—have been stirring discord by publicly criticizing the Trump campaign, arguing that he needs new leadership who will direct him to take harder-line stances on topics like race and immigration.
They want an even bigger racist asshole to run.
LOL my friend, you give too much credit. Rats and sinking ships are as far as we need to analyze. :)
I've been against the orange dickhead's campaign since before it was fashionable.
Good
Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Mother Jones:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/nick-fuentes-candace-owens-far-right-influencers-are-turning-against-trumps-campaign/