Spoiler: Probably not
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
10 points (85.7% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5301 readers
404 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Possibly, but not because of what is accomplished there. If anything it will be the optics of holding it in a place where fossil fuels is literally half of their economy and it being run by a fossil fuel executive.
This shows we can't rely on governments and corporations to fix it for the benefit of humanity.
Costs for renewables is going down. Support for ending car dependency and reducing meat consumption is growing.
Recent data shows that the majority of humans want to do something.
What does all this mean? In places where we can make a difference, it means YOU and I need to get to work. Be broken record on social media. Influence decision makers at work (greener is cheaper in many cases, so not a hard sell), become active in local politics where you have a better chance to influence things.
Here is the thing, the more we reduce the demand for oil, the less power and influence they have, so the easier it gets to make progress.
We don't need a savior, we need an army of regular people all doing their parts. The larger the army grows, the more it will be socially unacceptable to drive a canyonero and other harmful activities.
Not as long as conservatives and their corporate overlords are given such wide-spread access.
No.
No. If anything it will hasten it's demise. Ours