this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
277 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] QuincyPeck@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

My exact thought.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago

I’ll believe it when their candidate isn’t in an effective tie for the presidency

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Trickle down used to be called horse and sparrow. The idea was that if a horse ate a whole lot of oats, some wouldn't get digested and the sparrow could eat them. I wonder why they don't use that metaphor today 🤔

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because it's stupid easy to debunk with one question:

If you want to feed the sparrows, why don't you give them oats directly instead of making them pick through horseshit?

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Happy cake day! First one I’ve noticed since joining lemmy.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The sparrow in this analogy is of course the workers, who can pick the shit for the grain.

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I don't know, trickle down always sounded like piss play to me. Not much better, worse? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 5 months ago

The revolution will not be televised. Can't imagine that metaphor coming up on 60 minutes.

[–] InvisibleHat@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Are they?

I really don’t think they will figure it out.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Yeah bruh, let’s wait until November before making a determination on that.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

The trickle that you're currently feeling is from the rich pricks pissing all over you, not from economics. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

SOME Americans Are Wising Up to the GOP’s Tired Trickle-Down Scam. There are plenty who think it is wonderful, mostly the rich and "poorly educated", but expertly propagandized.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Only to blame its effects on democrats just as conservative news sources tell them.

All while they fall for the GOPs brand new “firehose of lies” scam. That or its low calorie sister-brand “torrent of bigotry”, which is also popular with the conservative crowd.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 5 months ago

Forty years too late, but I guess better than never.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Do these Americans have sufficiently low population density?

No?

Then it doesn't matter how wise they are.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] MunkyNutts@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Bueller Bueller Bueller...5

*40 years later... Here! Here!

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How ironic is it that I learned the term voodoo economics from an actual accountant playing the role of a fictional boring teacher that no one paid attention to?

[–] str82L@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

It must be the diapers that are stopping the trickling down.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It'll trickle so much and so very very fast, you'll say wow I've never been tricked on like that before, and you're just gonna love it.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

You'll be tired of getting trickled on so hard. There'll be so much trickling going on.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's no need in trying to revive Reaganomics, it never went away. Every president since him has practiced trickle down economics

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

Name one president who has not been a neoliberal since Reagan.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Who has refused to strike down Trumps tax cuts for the rich? Who, when asked, if he would strike down Trump's tax cuts for the rich responded. with an astounding, 'NO?'

Every single Democrat along with every Republican since Reagan has practiced trickle down economics. For all intents Biden is Reagan's 11th term

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Riiiight. I guess with a username like yours, everyone is the enemy of whatever you think is right and just 😂

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 5 months ago

I have a different username, hopefully it doesn't offend you somehow. Let me give you an example of what the other person meant: credit cards have replaced large parts of our social safety nets. We think of the convenience but we aren't told how convenient credit was argued as a substitute for welfare programs. Now I'm getting ads to have groceries delivered on credit.