this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
130 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

71143 readers
2937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, uhm, what the hell is going on with all these ad posts I’m seeing in this community?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 164 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Whenever you see something like this, please just report the post as spam, block the user and petition your community moderators to recruit more mods, especially in other time zones.

Even better, volunteer as mod yourself.

Also please tell your admins to use an application rather than just the captcha - the captchas are easily broken.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We also need shareable blacklists if they federate as well then that would be ideal. Surly someone can write a community thats a bot that gives democracy to blocklists.

[–] CrayonMaster@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not necessarily a bad idea, but most the spam I've seen is from new accounts on larger instances, so I'm not sure it'll help with this.

Seems like a user pattern that should be fairly detectable. Might not be a bad idea to scrape logs to look for spammy/copypaste comments, particularly on very new accounts, and either flag them for manual review or just ban them outright.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

yeah usually less than an hour to a few hours old. occasionally they make it to days.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish there was a seperate block as spam that would auto report. Some things I block due to lack of interest but others spam and our current report takes more clicks than I like. Then I would also like to be able to subscribe to peoples spam block list. If I like the cut of someones hib I might just subscribe to block any spam they block.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly could have different lists made by different communities democraricly.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah I want as much power pushed down to the individual as possible. I was even thinking you just sorta have recommended mods. like by default you are subscribed to their block lists for the community but if you subscribe you have an option to see unmoderated or such.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somewhat already exists, called Fediseer

There are a few other instances that subscribe to lemmy.world's censures list on there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some instances may not want to use democracy to decide on what to block. But some web of trust would be nice perhaps. Like I trust an instance and if that instance blocks another instance, maybe I'd block it too.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thinking more on a per user basis content tagging should defiantly have blacklists as well. But tags arent a thing yet?

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think they are. The closest thing is hashtags but tags aren't really a thing in ActivityPub as far as I'm aware. This kind of system will also always depend on people correctly tagging their stuff of course.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Never have seen one so I'm guessing it's not all that common

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is relatively common in that it happens regularly, but people thankfully downvote it so it rarely lands in peoples' feeds.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 20 points 1 year ago

I usually report them as spam.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Not all of us get downvotes, I see them pretty much daily...

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Looks like they might be removed (except one). Sorting by new and looking for downvoted posts I just see the one ad and an article about string theory + AI (double whammy).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Haven't seen any ads. Maybe your Lemmy mobile app is inserting ads?

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 28 points 1 year ago

It makes me wonder if this place is getting bigger and more relevant, if it's attracting interest from spammers.

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bots and lack of mods on different timezones most likely.

Would probably make sense to have an account age requirement and comment requirement before posting somehow.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 33 points 1 year ago (9 children)

account age requirement and comment requirement before posting

This can also be very unwelcoming to new users though. Reddit often feels like a closed place because so many subs have karma requirements. I'd prefer we didn't go there.

We should rather stop allowing sign ups without an application. The captchas are not good enough.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should rather stop allowing sign ups without an application. The captchas are not good enough.

That's near impossible to enforce, due to the federated nature. Server admins could whitelist which instances they trust, but I don't think that'll do much good from a community point of view.

Perhaps a sticky to find better moderator/timezone coverage could help. (And for that matter, I wouldn't mind stricter moderation on post relevance - not all news about tech companies or events that just happen to take place online is tech news, imho)

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

near impossible to enforce, due to the federated nature. Server admins could whitelist

What if you could automatically federate with any instance requiring an application, but anything else you would need to whitelist? Maybe that could work.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm no federation expert, but I think if you could convince your own instance admin, or the one hosting this community (lemmy.world), to do so, you'd be good. But that would potentially affect a lot more users than just the ones in this community, so they might take some effort.

Also, I'm not aware of any tools that could automate this for you.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago

I know there isn't anything like this now, I'm basically just theorycrafting how it should/could function :)

[–] moody@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you think that's unwelcoming, applications are even more so. Most people don't want to fill out an essay just to be allowed to participate.

If I had to fill out an application, I wouldn't be here, and I'm sure a lot of others wouldn't be either.

That's not to say that better methods shouldn't be implemented though.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An application doesn't have to be an essay. Feddit.dk has an application that literally just requires a sentence or two. It's really not a big barrier to entry.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For that matter - I'm okay with filtering out people who think it's too much effort. Quality over quantity.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly my thoughts as well :)

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I agree here. Filling out an application would have easily kept me out. Many may see that as a good thing though :)

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 9 points 1 year ago

Then you don't get any new people at all. (Or very few)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think this would be great to limit this. I really don't understand people wanting to comment right away. I just lurked for like a month to get a feel before I decided to participate.

load more comments (4 replies)

I guess a timezone difference too since I never see any ads.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Saw that too, it's annoying. In a weird way, spam kinda legitimizes this platform as a Reddit alternative.

[–] drawerair@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you mean? When I lurk here, I ignore the sites that Idk. I rely on sites that I know are legit like Verge, Techcrunch, Engadget, Cnbc, Bloomberg, Ars Technica and Electrek. The sites that Idk may be legit too but I don't wanna spend much time researching the legitimacy.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

No idea, but I notice it too

Just blocked and reported an account and the single shill-post it produced. Not sure what to do about it, maybe we need more mods

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's room for innovation. If enough people downvote, or flag a post, and those people have enough interaction with the community, let's say posting credit, or comments, or account age etc etc etc then a bot could auto remove posts. Kind of like craigslist does, or at least put those posts into a quarantine queue until a human can release it

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 14 points 1 year ago

There's many problems with automatic removals though. It can be abused for instance.

load more comments
view more: next ›