this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

196

16359 readers
2375 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 points 5 months ago

That wasn’t real communism. Everybody’s equal under real communism.

Hetero people would get executed too!

[–] muse@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If those tankies could read, they'd be very upset!

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Advocating for Communism is not Advocating for the USSR.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Hence why we call them Tankies and not communists

Edit: Stop defending Tankies. If you are truly a Communist that doesnt support Russia and China, then defending the Tankies by letting them pretend ALL communists get called Tankies is only making you look bad by comparison. If Tankie was synonymous with communist, it wouldnt need to exist as a word.

2nd edit: I'm giving some of you WAAAYYY too much benefit of doubt but heres a further point, at the moment there is two options

1: You help clarify that Tankie means "Communist who Supports Authoritarian Regimes and their use of violences to suppress dissent" for people who are using the word incorrectly

or

2: You help create a smokescreen for Tankies to hide behind and let Tankie and Communist blur so Tankies can claim that all Communists get called that so the word means nothing. And if you are successful in that, the vast majority of us with great distaste for the Chinese and Russian goverment will just switch to telling ALL communists to fuck off because we certainly arent going to grow more tolerance for regimes that have no issues violently suppressing minorities

There is no 3rd option

Final Addition: 9 communists are sitting at a table when 1 Tankie decides to join the table. No one rejects the Tankie from sitting. 10 Tankies sit at a table

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I get called a tankie quite regularly advocating for Communism, like it or not the terms are becoming ubiquitous.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago

Conservatives and liberal chuds also use it because they see us saying it, not realising that it's a call-out of viscous authoritarianism, and not necessarily a critique of communism let alone socialism.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The old adage goes "if you meet an asshole once in the morning, you merely met an asshole. If you meet an asshole in the morning, at noon and again at night, you are the asshole"

Reassess your behavior and stance; if you're getting called a tankie it isn't because the whole world decided to shift a definition.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Eh it is a bit of a catch-all though tbh

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It really isnt. Tankie is specifically for those who'd support Russia and China. Are you defending Russia's invasion of Ukraine? Are you making arguements that Taiwan should become part of China? THEN you are a Tankie, but if you believe true Communism hasnt been done yet, and Russia and China DEFINITELY havent done it right, then no one who matters is going to call you a Tankie. If Tankie and Communist were synonymous, there would literally be no need for the term Tankie. You dont see "Fuck off Communists" everywhere on Lemmy, you see "Fuck off Tankies"

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yeah that's too much singular linguistic prescriptivism for me. I've definitely seen a litany of people here called tankies. Lots of people just decrying US imperialism, particularly what's happening in Gaza, lots of people criticizing Biden, that's a classic way to get accused of being a tankie, I think I've also seen people advocating for basic shit like healthcare being called tankies. Prison reform is a big one that'll get you called a tankie, as well as lots of anti-police takes, for whatever reason.

Yeah. It's a term that's like originating out of apologia for the suppression of the Hungarian revolution, it's not used for that anymore. The definition has changed historically and from person to person over time. It doesn't have this clear meaning that you seem to think it does. It can have that clear meaning for you, sure, you've defined your use case, but you can't really guarantee that every other person using that term is going to use it correctly. It would be, you know, theoretically, pretty advantageous for some right wingers to pose as left wing and then just kind of throw around a term commonly used in left wing circles as a derogatory term to shut down discussions, with basically no coherence to use.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Look, you can either have a term for idiots who support russia and china when they CLAIM to care about minority rights, or you can defend the tankies because SOME people are using the term incorrectly. There isnt a 3rd option at the moment. Do you want us to start telling ALL communists to fuck off instead of just Tankies? Because thats the end result of being successful with your arguement. So you can either further the clarification that Tankies are communists that Support Russia or China, or you can help build a smoke screen for Tankies to hide behind. Pick one

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You could just tell them that supporting Russia and China is bad, or that those are authoritarian regimes, and cite sources, rather than dismissing them out of hand, based on what the surface level interpretation of their arguments are, you know?

We have more than a one word limit here on Lemmy, people can respond with thought out rebuttals, rather than one word dismissals. It's just that the one word dismissals are easier to write and understand, so they're more likely to get thrown at an argument early and then up votes after someone skims a long ass set of paragraphs.

There's not like an either-or option there, I also really question your "well if we don't discard tankies then we're gonna have to discard all communists, and how would you like that!". That doesn't make any sense to me. Your "Pick one" is a false dichotomy. People are capable of more nuanced conversations, just labelling people and throwing around out of hand dismissals isn't going to be helpful in actually working out anything, convincing those people, or convincing bystanders. Even if you were to convince bystanders with such a tactic, you'd be convincing them in a bad faith way where they don't fully understand the usage of the term, so they'd be just as likely to throw it around as an out of hand dismissal without understanding what it means.

But then I suppose, you know, it's probably gonna be easier for most people to just call me a tankie and move on, right, on the basis that my argument advocating for nuanced responses and more well-reasoned argumentation is actually carrying water and "providing a smokescreen for tankies", so I might as well be one, right? Term gets stretched even further.

I have always been of the belief that if you are to respond, it better be with a well-reasoned and dignified comment, rather than just a kind of lazy dismissal. If people are doing shit that's actually against the rules, then report them. If they're engaging in bad faith behavior, you are more likely to reveal that by responding to them with good faith behavior than also responding with bad faith behavior. If you aren't going to say something nice, don't bother to say anything at all, or, put another way, don't feed the trolls.

Dunno why internet rules 101 is becoming such an uncommon thing now.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Or or, if you wanna defend Tankies, I literally dont have time for you. Do I give Nazi's time to explain the nuances of their views? No, same goes for Tankies

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's your ideal, we're giving communists who dont support Russia and China respect by labelling Tankies as Tankies, and not Communists, but if you want to give the Tankies a smoke screen to hide behind by letting the two terms blur, then its more your loss than its mine. Russia and China are not bastions of LGBTQ rights though, so I dont know why you'd want to help the Tankies

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Just puked a little bit in my mouth. And chuckled

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I remember tankies telling on Reddit me how "Pushing for LGBT Rights is forcing Western ideals on non-Western people" and how "Putin killing the gays is good actually".... the Horse Shoe Theory is real

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Horse shoe theory still doesn't work-- you have to change to the stethoscope model to include tankies

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"I'm so leftist I'm voting for Trump" --some young voters unironucally

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

More like bots and bad faith commentators.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I want to believe this, I do, but that would mean that !libertyhub@lemmy.blahaj.zone is filled with nothing but

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

119 subscribers, 5 users a day.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

That describes like half of Lemmy though

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

wasnt the ussr one of the first places in the planet to stop criminalizing gays?

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, then Stalin recriminalized it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Under Joseph Stalin, the Soviet Union recriminalized homosexuality in a decree signed in 1933. The new Article 121, which punished "muzhelozhstvo" with imprisonment for up to 5 years, saw raids and arrests. Female homosexuals were sent to mental institutions. The decree was part of a broader campaign against "deviant" behavior and "Western degeneracy". Following Stalin's death, there was a liberalisation of attitudes toward sexual issues in the Soviet Union, but homosexual acts remained illegal. Discrimination against LGBT individuals persisted in the Soviet era, and homosexuality was not officially declassified as a mental illness until 1999.
[...]
Since 2000, a campaign by Russian president Vladimir Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church to promote "traditional Russian values" and oppose "liberalism" in regards to homosexuality has led to many pieces of anti-LGBT legislation being passed federally, including the banning of distribution of "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relationships to minors" in 2013, an amendment in Russia's constitution banning same-sex marriage passed in 2020, and expansion of the 2013 propaganda law signed in 2022 to apply it to anyone, regardless of age.

Taken from this article.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

were gays actually executed? from what i hear from cuba for example, treatment was much less bad than elsewhere. dunno about the ussr.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Treatment was less bad in Cuba iirc but still included sending people to go work on sugar plantations, which is pretty back-breaking and horrifying labor. I mean, horrifying to the point that the Spanish colonial state were willing to force their slaves to do it, you know?

Luckily this isn't an issue anymore as cuba has somewhat recently liberalized their constitution and legislated free medical care for trans people and decriminalized homosexuality, probably in no small part due to the "thaw" that Obama put in place (probably one of his small wins), opening them up for better tourism and money, that trump then reversed and Biden has maintained.

But shhh, you didn't hear any that from me, Cuba's only allowed to be evil.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

"Cuban gay writer Reinaldo Arenas wrote, "[T]he decade of the sixties ... was precisely when all the new laws against homosexuals came into being, when the persecution started and concentration camps were opened, when the sexual act became taboo while the 'new man' was being proclaimed and masculinity was being exalted.""

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Cuba

[–] Liz@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not educated enough to say one way or another, sorry. I was just providing a source for the recriminalization.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

User is a tankie JAQing off in bad faith.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Can you explain what your implication is?

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 5 months ago

The Soviet government of the Russian Soviet Republic (RSFSR) decriminalised homosexuality in December 1917, following the October Revolution and the discarding of the Legal Code of Tsarist Russia.

The legalisation of homosexuality was confirmed in the RSFSR Penal Code of 1922, and following its redrafting in 1926. According to Dan Healey, archival material that became widely available following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 "demonstrates a principled intent to decriminalize the act between consenting adults, expressed from the earliest efforts to write a socialist criminal code in 1918 to the eventual adoption of legislation in 1922.

Taken from here