this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35562 readers
1696 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription

"Yay! Now I have to pay another subscription! I'm so excited! Let's celebrate with them!" - nobody

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have no skin in this game but I think it sounds like they need to change their name from "open subtitles" to "closed captioning"

Edit: stupid STT

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Eyyyyyy got em

[–] ilega_dh@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gather all the worlds subtitles under the guise of being “open” and then bait and switch when you’re the largest subtitles database out there.

The free API had a limit of 20 subs/day, you’re not going to tell me those server costs were significant.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The new API has the exact same free limit. They're just dropping support for the old API soon and people who want to depend on the old version will need to pay for its continued support because they want to push everyone onto the new site/API

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

then they utterly failed to communicate that lol

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yea OP should update the post. OS did a horrible job communicating but its not as dire as the title projects.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 year ago

I think it goes from 20 to 5. 10 if you're not anonymous. To get more you need to have contributed to the site, monetarily or other wise.

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

REST API docs

Your consumer can query the API on its own, and download 5 subtitles per IP's per 24 hours, but a user must be authenticated to download more. Users will then be able to download as many subtitles as their ranks allows, from 10 as simple signed up user, to 1000 for VIP user.

I think it's reasonable move. They have Legacy API that cost them a lot of manhours to maitain and they decided to cut on costs and replace it with a new thing. Sadly they decresed amount of api calls from 20 to 5 [needs citation]

I think they don't have good PR guy to better communicate the change

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Subtitles are like 5kb text files, why even limit their downloads in any way?

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The overhead isn't the storage but the request. Processing a request takes CPU time, which can get expensive when people setup a media server and request subtitles for dozens of movies and shows. Every episode of a TV show is a separate request and that can add up fast when you scale it to thousands of users.

Money money money moooonnneey

(Mah-nee!)

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If they're storing them in something like Amazon s3, there is a cost (extremely low, but not free) associated with retrieving data regardless of size.

Even if they were an entirely free service, it'd make sense to put hard rate limits on unauthenticated users and more generous rate limits on authenticated ones.

Leaving out rate limits is a good way to discover that you have users who will use your API real dumb.

Their pricing model seems fucked, but that's aside from the rate limits.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

Electricity aint exactly free. Even if the data they store is minuscule. Servers will pull >300w if you store 10gb or 2000gb.

[–] Tag365@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why is it called "OpenSubtitles" if you have to pay for it to use it in any capacity?

[–] Zoidberg@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So what pisses me off in these cases is this: they didn't contribute with the data. They're a convenient aggregator, I give them that, but the data came from third parties. If you want to start charging for convenient access to the data you should at least make all data before you started charging available in a bulk download for free.

[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't call yourself open ffs

[–] ky56@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

openAI anyone?

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

You just need to move to the new API, which is free, the old one is still available temporarily if you pay

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

contribute to a greater cause

For the greater good, that is their pockets.

[–] burgersc12@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I am your wife! I am the greatest good you are ever gonna get!

[–] b0gl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol gotta pay for "adfree subtitles"

"Luke, I am [over the moon for these Sobeys™️ rebates!]"

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

well it has been deprecated for a few years, and they're basically asking you to play for continued support.
they have a new REST api, but you still need the old one, pay up because otherwise there's no motivation to keep it around.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, are chocolate rations up to 60 grams now?

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

No, they're up to 20 grams now! Isn't that great!?

HOLY SHIT! 12 whole dollars a YEAR to keep using the deprecated API they don't want to support anymore. What monsters.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] JStenoien@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, for up to 20 calls per day.

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Why is the title so misleading then?

[–] 6h0st_in_the_machin3@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's be clear in one thing:

  • There's no free lunches.

That's it. Everything in the Universe, including you, has a "price" on energy. Now outside of all crony-capitalism craziness, we should all consider having a open, distributed, fair price Internet and it's resources.

I'm calling Louis.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Plenty of places provide free lunches. They're still paid for, but they're free at the point of service. Eg homeless shelters, Wikipedia.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't believe that all this time I could have been getting my lunch for free at wikipedia.org

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jimmy Wales serves it himself, with a side of the softcore porn he first made his fortune on.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's an unorthodox side dish to say the least, but I suppose beggars can't be choosers.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Sikh gurdwaras will also serve free food

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Anger is a form of excitement.