Linkedin : memes

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 101 points 6 months ago (2 children)

AI = 0 □

[+] InputZero@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn't give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

Instead you'd get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

And that's not even the correct formula. It's

E^2 = (mc^(2))^2 + (pc)^2

You can't just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

The way to remember this is that it's equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d'Alembert operator at the end

[+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 54 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 51 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like some ~~bullshit artist~~ motivational speaker

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably an AI expert too

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And a Bitcoin Scholar

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 6 months ago

Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire "crypto" shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

[–] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

WTF does Indian have to do with anything?

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It also means AI = 0

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've heard about an extended version of the equation:
E^2^ = m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^
Or E = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^

If so, AI = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^ - mc^2^

I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood..

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well math might be, physics for sure isn't

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 41 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I'd bet money that was written by an LLM.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

😆

[–] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Deleted

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 40 points 6 months ago

LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

[–] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

!linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] AyuTsukasa@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I love that's it's not "what are you on about?" it's just a general what

[–] Logh@lemmy.ml 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 25 points 6 months ago

Reading this is an actual cognitive hazard.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I want to know who this idiot is.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

his name is Chatgpt

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I mean, the equation isn't wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] maculata@aussie.zone 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] wesley@yall.theatl.social 16 points 6 months ago

This reads like a post written by AI as well lol

[–] emerald@beehaw.org 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

AI+8k+5G

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We need a = sign sonewhere, right?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope, none of this is math.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 11 points 6 months ago

they did the meth right

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

I like how the OP's name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago

Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He should have let an AI proofread this…

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Critical support for struggling academics trying to grift some brainless tech bro billionaire out of his money

Oops my bad I mess read who’s the phd and who’s the sentient clipart

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ha! "Consultant / Technology Manager" -- pretty sure he's just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.

Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.

load more comments (1 replies)

Memes

Rules: