this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
125 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

71999 readers
3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sramder@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Popular Science/Mechanics runs this story every 5 years. I'm not even going to read it this time ;-)

They are cool though. I remember watching the one in the bond film as a kid

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

She's built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a bistro.

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Douglas Adams had such a gift for drawing the scene.

[–] newH0pe@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago

Well this one is a quote from the irreplaceable Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 2 years ago

True, as did Terry Pratchett.

Utterly irrelevant here, but true nonetheless.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've been reading stories about the return of airships all my life. Unless they make them weatherproof, it's not happening.

[–] eddietrax@dmv.social 11 points 2 years ago

“It’s electric”

Boogie woogie woogie

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Any links to a non paywalled article?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ahhh, much better. Thank you.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Any time you need to bypass a paywall just copy the link to the wayback machine.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or just open it in Firefox and click the reader mode button.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m mobile only, but if I ever need to this is good to know

[–] bit_thanos@monero.town 1 points 2 years ago

Try Tor browser

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Are you on iphone? You can definitely do this on Firefox Android, not sure about iOS (but I would guess you can)

Heck, Safari has a reader mode too.

[–] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I'm entirely on board with this, figuratively but also literally, if given the opportunity. It would be a blast to ride one of these things long distance. As far as cargo goes, I'd like to see a comparison on volume- if it can carry more cargo, it might still out-perform faster cargo planes just for sheer tonnage.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 3 points 2 years ago
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“In 1930, there was no way to detect [hydrogen]—it was a tasteless, odorless, invisible gas,” Prentice says, noting that today you can buy handheld detectors on Amazon that are capable of sensing hydrogen in parts per million. “Hydrogen will not burn at anything less than four parts per hundred, so long before you get to any risk of a fire with hydrogen, you can ventilate the area… Hydrogen is much harder to burn than people think.”

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We should strap a nuclear reactor to one and use it for cargo that is dangerous.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] just_squanch_it@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"one broad with a static-y vest..."

[–] Maltese_Liquor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's rigid airship!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

This got me wondering: Are there that many flights that their emissions alone would be problematic (assuming all other forms of emissions are eliminated with EVs and other green energy sources)?

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

About 3.5% of the effects of climate change in 2022. So, yes.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Big electric zeppelins could replace some shipping as well.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

You have a MASSIVE assumption in there honestly.

[–] Taringano@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course, there are all. Those. Chem trails

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 2 years ago

To be fair, water vapor is a chemical.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

She's got a zeppelin full of eccentrics.