this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
125 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

72267 readers
3858 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“In 1930, there was no way to detect [hydrogen]—it was a tasteless, odorless, invisible gas,” Prentice says, noting that today you can buy handheld detectors on Amazon that are capable of sensing hydrogen in parts per million. “Hydrogen will not burn at anything less than four parts per hundred, so long before you get to any risk of a fire with hydrogen, you can ventilate the area… Hydrogen is much harder to burn than people think.”

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We should strap a nuclear reactor to one and use it for cargo that is dangerous.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] just_squanch_it@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"one broad with a static-y vest..."

[–] Maltese_Liquor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's rigid airship!