this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
344 points (97.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
633 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
344
World will look back at 2023 as year humanity exposed its inability to tackle climate crisis, scientists say (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

CFCs was only a few small industries. CO2 is a lot of really big industries, so a whole lot more pushback and lobbying and fossil fuel propaganda.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why is it a difficult concept of, "no earth, no profit"?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 20 points 10 months ago

Because all the people that will lose profit will be dead by then so they don't care

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Tragedy of the commons, benefit to an individual incentives a larger harm to everyone.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

More like tragedy of capitalism, since it's the only system in world history where so called "tragedy of the commons" actually happens with any regularly, proven by the fact there were sucessfully managed Commons millenia old before capitalism ruined them and claimed they were always doomed from the start