this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
555 points (94.7% liked)

Games

16800 readers
566 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] devbo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

well, i thought of it as fallout 4 in space before playing. it has a couple core gameplay changes i liked and a couple i didn't. it is the slowest paced bethesda game for sure, which is why i think most people call it boring. if you didnt replay skyrim i doubt you would replay this game. i give it a 7/10 for people of my taste and i would consider myself the intended audience. i have played bethesda games since oblivion and average about 200 hours per bethesda game, usually 3 playthroughs seperated by about a year or 2. for reference here are my top bethesda games:

  1. Fallout: New Vegas - 9/10(obsidian for a major win)
  2. Fallout 3 - 9/10
  3. Oblivion - 9/10
  4. Skyrim - 8/10
  5. Fallout 4 - 8/10
  6. Starfield - 7/10
  7. Fallout 76 - 3/10 - i wish i could enjoy this game

these scores reflect how much i enjoyed each game. but if New Vegas had no technical issues it would be 10/10 for me.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Ye, that makes perfect sense, thanks! From your other scoring, i can see the game isnt that bad, but just average. Even compared to the others, which are rated a lot higher. From this i can also assume id enjoy the game for like 30sh hours, because this isnt 100% my jam. For me that wouldnt be worth the full price, but i can understand for somebody that would put 200h in np it would be worth it :)

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah it's not a bad game by any standards, but it's not mind-blowingly great either. It has some cool and interesting concepts.

[–] devbo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

yeah pretty much. i wouldnt recommend it to anybody that doesn't love bethesda's other games.

[–] Buddahriffic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's on game pass if you want a (potentially) cheaper way to try it.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

No thanks. Im personally against gsme pass. I dont like their model snd prefer to own things

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

New Vegas

Mirrors from a tower plant magically turning into solar panels when installed on an airbase? 0/10 unplayable.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can I mod new Vegas to make it look or perform better on an Xbox? The graphics really break my immersion.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The Xbox version sucks ass, easily the buggiest version. Play it on PC, anything can run it now.

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

New Vegas has no technical issues if you mod it properly these days!