this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
66 points (98.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44434 readers
1059 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like, would a skyscraper-style datacenter be practical? Or is just a matter of big, flat buildings being cheaper?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Electricity has a hard time flowing up and requires a special pumping system.

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Which begs the question why not magnets at the top of the building to help pull the electricity up?

Because when it rains poof, no more magnets.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because nobody knows how magnets work.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Solution: construct the buildings upside down, so the foundations are up in the air and the roofs are underground. That way, the electricity will flow down instead of up.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But then the roof has to support the entire weight of planet Earth on top of it, which is a much harder engineering challenge than pumping the electricity in the first place.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's not. It's all empty space under the foundation. There's nothing to create crushing force against the building.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You are failing to account for the weight of the atmosphere on the foundation

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago

The atmosphere is just air. Air doesn't have mass or weight, that's why it floats.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 23 hours ago

Because the electricity pulls the magnets down in the same measure, so they meet in the middle. Newton's 2nd law or something.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You joke, but heat does rise and a tall building would need to make extra concessions for cooling concerns, while also dealing with the issues if weight. Large racks of servers are actually quite heavy, which is why many datacenters in i.e Toronto were built in an ex parking garage

[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Heat is no issue of relevance for the question. The rising effect it negligible compared to what has to be transported anyway. I also can't imagine racks being heavier than eg books in s library.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

How many high-rise libraries do you see? Weight is absolutely a factor in data center design, as is airflow/heat

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 7 points 23 hours ago

Unironically, I've had people telling me they save electric energy by inserting the angled Schuko plugs of their electric devices 'upwards'.