this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
152 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck AI

4589 readers
1458 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
152
If this isn't a warning sign to leave YT as a creator, nothing will be. (invidious.tiekoetter.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So, given AI is destroying YT, if you're any sort of a creator at all, even if you just have some random posts from years ago that you uploaded with no intention of getting popular, you really should move your stuff to PeerTube, ideally on a self-hosted instance if you have the hardware to spare, while you still can, because things are only going to get worse for YT.

Even Odysee is a decent alternative if you want more traction, but PeerTube is more ideal as an alternative platform due to having the ability to self-host an instance there and have complete control of your content and presence down to owning the infrastructure you're posting on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miked@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Anybody receiving income from a site they do not control should diversify. Ideally they should have their own site and use uncontrolled sites to funnel people to that site. That way a platform ban does not kill all income.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But distributing content only on your own site would also kill all income

[–] miked@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

I agree 100%.

The idea is to use the other platforms to attempt to get people to use your site first (funnel) in order to cut out the middleman.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what federation is for.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Federation doesn't generate revenue.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Revenue is generated the same way it is on YouTube, minus a single monopolistic and exploitative avenue. Federation just increases visibility and discoverability.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

PeerTube has ads?

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't see ads in YT. Thanks to uBlock.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That don't exist.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh?

[–] know_your_place@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago

Hey look it's the AA-obsessed twat.

Look, what they're saying and you're failing to understand is that there's no system of remuneration for creators on any federated and decentralised platform.

There you go. Hope your day is as bright as you.