this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
329 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

77035 readers
2235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
329
FFmpeg to Google: Fund Us or Stop Sending Bugs (thenewstack.io)
submitted 1 week ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Twitter must be the worst platform to hold discussions on ever conceived, even before it turned into a fascist echo chamber.

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Microblogging has always sucked IMO. It's always been more geared towards shouting your opinion and leaving, and it actively discourages any discussion by hiding reply threads and making it a nightmare to follow. Most people aren't ready for this take, though...

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Bluesky has reply threads, but in general I agree

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The whole idea behind Twitter (character limits etc.) was obviously a bad idea from the moment texting became obsolete thanks to IM services.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean because Twitter is an SMS-based messaging app?... The character limits are arbitrary, not a technical limitation. Which is why they doubled them at one point, I believe.

The limits were meant to act as a micro-blogging enforcement measure, for micro attention spans.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually, no, the initial limit was precisely because of SMS character limits - Twitter in the first few years had an SMS gateway where you could send a text and it would be posted under your account.

Obviously later on it was an arbitrarily kept limit, but the limit itself, even doubled, makes it a horrible platform for any kind of debate.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I see... TIL, thanks.

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's like saying that a battleaxe is too unwieldy for cooking. Yes you are correct, but why the hell are you using a battleaxe for cooking?

Use the right tools for the right job.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 28 points 1 week ago

I think that's exactly what he's saying.