this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
233 points (98.7% liked)

News

33209 readers
2920 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

November payments have been significantly delayed, forcing families to go hungry. A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to distribute benefits in full by Friday.

Haley is one of more than 40 million people across the country who count on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, a federal benefit that dates back to the late 1930s. But disruptions to SNAP, also known as food stamps, during what has become the longest government shutdown in American history have left recipients facing imminent hunger, unable to restock their pantries or refrigerators.

Although the Trump administration said partial funds would be distributed this month — a response to a lawsuit challenging its plan to suspend SNAP payments during the shutdown — recipients who were due to receive their benefits this week have empty balances.

On Thursday, the federal judge in that lawsuit ordered the Trump administration to distribute SNAP funding in full to states by Friday, though it remains to be seen whether recipients’ electronic benefits cards will be refilled that quickly. Previously, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins had said it could take several weeks to deliver the benefits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 70 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's been very telling this week at work.

I live in a very red area and work in a majority red industry. I hear people talking shit about "the libs" all day. I hear tons of coworkers talking shit about anyone on government assistance because the "welfare queens just want free stuff with no work"

It seems that just under 3/4 of the people I work with were getting SNAP benefits.

A box has been set up in the break room so people can bring in food, and others can take what they need.

The shit talking has stopped, at least. No jokes about "welfare queens" anymore.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

It doesn’t appear your company pays a living wage if 3/4 its employees need Government assistance for food.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have recently had a shift on perception, and I'm trying to get everyone to see it, too.

You know those St Jude commercials with the cute cancer kids, and the crying parents, and everyone so happy that St Jude is taking care of those kids, and covering all the costs? People watch those commercials, shed a tear, and send money.

It doesn't occur to them that these facilities don't exist anywhere else, not because America is so great, but because in nearly every other country, parents don't have to be rich, or have expensive health insurance, or hit the charity lottery, or the PR lottery, they just take their kid to the hospital, and they get the care they need.

Instead of sending your money to a hospital that is doing what our country should be doing anyway, and use your money to elect candidates that will actually improve the health care in this country, and not just use it as a tool to exploit our citizens.

And now we have employers setting up food banks for their employees, and people think that's an honorable thing to do, understanding the hardships of their employees.

But if they truly understood the hardships of their employees, they would PAY them enough that they wouldn't have to count on the government to supplement their employees living costs.

IF we ever take back our country from the EVIL TRAITORS, we will have to rebuild a lot of our infrastructure, giving us an unprecedented opportunity to build it properly. One of the things we should do is track every American corporation's reliance on government programs to supplement employee pay. They should have to pay the government back for every penny that their employees take in government assistance, along with a hefty fine. That will make it more economically advantageous to pay the employees directly, rather than count on the government to feed them.

Many charities are just scams that exploits the deliberate weaknesses of our system. We should fix our system, and reduce our reliance on these phony support schemes.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I've been thinking about almost the same thing a lot lately

Specifically the impact and ethics of donating to support private assistance programs. I worry that donating to things like St. Jude's is just reinforcing the status quo. Similarly, if I'm donating to support food shelves now, would that be reinforcing the idea that government benefits, like SNAP, are unnecessary? Would I be reinforcing the idea that government doesn't work?

By and large, poorer people that need a social safety net tend to vote Republicans into office. Is the negative impact of conservative policies obfuscated by private support temporarily plugging the gaps?

Healthcare especially. The US has a fundamentally inefficient healthcare system, but most people don't realize how inefficient it is because the costs are spread around so much. The fact employers pay much of the premiums makes people forget that the premiums are actually absurdly expensive. Same story with ACA subsidies. Most people couldn't afford ACA without the subsidies. Rather than racking up more debt, I feel like we need to fix our inefficient system first. We lack the political will to do so though, since most people don't understand how expensive health insurance actually is

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago

Hope the box had leopard spots on it.