this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

10629 readers
529 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know we have a bunch of parts manufacturers. That Avro thing that Ford would trot out was fairly well publicized, even if many didn't understand what it was.

That Avro thing was also not an actual Canadian EV. It was a vapour-ware marketing vehicle. Its purpose was to show that Canadian companies could make all the components that go in to an EV, so that Ontario could try and attract foreign companies to use those component makers. IE. it was a proof of concept marketing tool, meant to try and sell sub-contracting services to foreign companies/interests. There was never an actual plan to make a Canadian EV on Fords roadmap. In a world where foreign companies/interests are increasingly xenophobic/antagonistic, that's not something that I want my tax dollars going towards -- and in a world where Canada has no home grown options for EVs, I want foreign options available at low costs.

We're literally watching whole cities burn due to climate change out in western Canada. And we're playing politics with sustainable options / clean energy projects.

Besides, like Ford's own ad references, protectionist tariffs deployed to protect an inefficient/non-innovative industry are bad. They also lead to trade wars. I see no reason to prioritize the interests of a small sector in Ontario, over the interests of the Canola farmers in Sask/Man. And you're not too clear on where that 'investment' is coming from in the second paragraph, but if it's from gov as well, that industry just looks even worse in terms of being a leech of resources -- and is almost a poster child for the sort of things the Reagan piece was condemning. IE. a non-innovative industry incapable of competing with international options, being propped up by gov investments, and protected by gov tariffs, with practically no deliverable we can point to as regular non-industry employed citizens.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

It was a vapour-ware marketing vehicle

Be wary of anything involving Woodbridge Auto Group and Flavio Volpe.

Remember when they were suppposed to provide a million masks a month? No one saw them again after they got into Doug's pickup