this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
653 points (96.8% liked)

science

22362 readers
261 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
653
Researchers took 44 men and gave either plant-protein or animal-protein supplements for 12 weeks while strength training. There was no statistical difference in muscle strength or mass between groups (www.tandfonline.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.world
253 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

they do not explicitly include food from home production or differentiate subgroups within a population.

this also seriously considered poore-nemecek 2018 as a source uncritically.

and they assume everyone is paying full retail price for food, where most poor people actually receive some kind of subsidized or free food.

the model diet they used is not vegan, but flexitarian.

this is not very good evidence you've presented, so I still doubt the claim is true