this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
166 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

10795 readers
388 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space

Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯

πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ

πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz
166
Zelenskyy vows to only use Tomahawks against Russian military targets (www.aljazeera.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Hopefully we should see some flamingos doin stuff soon

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You haven't been following the development of that "weapons platform" very closely, then. It's about as likely as Trump's plan for rare earth metals.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean yeah I haven't been following it that closely because I dont have the time or attention to follow more than the broad strokes of the war nowadays

But even still from what I've seen it looks more likely than Trump's ridiculous plan

A lot of what I do actively consume about Ukraine is from https://youtube.com/@perunau (great channel btw), and whatever randomly crosses my lemmy feed

EDIT:

Wait a sec, after having done a bit of quick searching, it looks like it's already confirmed to have been used a couple of times? And is actively in production? Why do you think it's not real?

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Tbh most of those points are irrelevant or make no sense, and are easily refutable (Id go down the list but I really don't have the time rn, might do it this evening)

The only potentially valid one is the corruption stuff, but I'd have to look into it more.

Any other sources besides some random twitter guy?

load more comments (3 replies)