this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
80 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

10551 readers
781 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org -5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This would be a bad deal for Canada.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, kneecapping our canola industry to support the USA's foreign policy, on the other hand, is a great deal for us.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This would be a bad deal for ~~Canada~~ the big car companies that have been producing massive, dangerous, filthy, wasteful monster trucks instead of smaller EVs thanks to protectionist policies.

FTFY

[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Accusing Canada or other Western countries of protectionism while defending China is a bit of hypocrisy, no?

In addition, look why these ChEaP cHiNeSe CaRs are that cheap. I don't want to buy a car or anything else that is made by slave labor.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

This is disinformation. They are cheap because of abundance in materials, easy/advanced factory construction, competition, and advanced leadership in robotics. It's just pure smear, not only to baselessly say slave labour exists in Xinxiang, but that it also applies to more prosperous provinces where cars are made.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Oh I'm not defending China. They're oppressive assholes who are jamming their populace into the gears of capitalism even faster than the Americans. Fuck those guys.

I just think it's a bit rich to try to make the argument that we should defend an industry that profits from building things we don't want so they can run over more kids, ruin more cities, and make a shittone of cash and then cry poor and demand a bailout.

Personally, I wouldn't buy one myself, but then again I try to avoid cheap Chinese crap as much as possible and I don't want a car. The "BuT sLaVe LaBoUr!" Argument would be great, if anyone seemed to care about that when buying phones, or solar panels, or basically anything else, but when it's invoked to defend American car companies, it's obviously not in good faith.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This would be a bad deal for Canada.

Point out even a single Canadian-made EV that would be affected by this.

There are no negative effects, so long as the vehicles pass safety standards. Bonus if we can enter into partnerships that would see those EVs assembled here.

And the low cost of these EVs would make vehicle ownership far easier for our young people, who already have an environment 8× more expensive (compared to their median wage) than their parents experienced at the same age.

[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The entire Canadian economy would be negatively effected in the long-term by such a move.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The entire Canadian economy would be negatively effected in the long-term by such a move.

TIL a higher standard of living is a “negative effect”.

[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 13 hours ago

You may have (intentionally?) misunderstood my comment.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah well... I'd like to do whatever Poland is doing.