this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
367 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

75992 readers
2550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 132 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

All I want is a car with modern engineering and simple technology. I'm fine with crank windows and a radio I can easily swap out. But I would like an engine that gets more than 7MPG and has crumple-zones that aren't my face. I don't need touchscreens and sensors for everything. And I sure as fuck don't want the manufacturer pushing out "updates" that can brick my car.

[–] arox@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 33 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Worst thing is they are collecting info on what people do in the car. Here is an article on Nissan monitoring sexual activity inside car.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 39 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I'm curious to see if there will be simpler electric cars in the future. Like the bare minimum electric circuit to make the car go forward. I could see a DIY kit for something like that. But the security standards these days ask for way more sensors and cameras to reduce risks of accidents wich is fair tbh.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Keep an eye on Slate. Hope they do well

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They won't. Funded by Amazon, corporate tracking will still be mandatory.

[–] FEIN@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If someone can jailbreak their kindles then hopefully someone can jailbreak the car haha

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

I would download a car

[–] DSN9@lemmy.ml 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You mean the Bezos mobile? Not a chance in hell.

Ownership has been flipped upside down for modern EV owners (and actually a lot more). You don't own the machine, nor the keys, you license the experience- software, data, and even the ability to start/ move the vehicle. 30k+ for remote access, EULAs, feature subscriptions to a connectivity mesh? Also the monthly connectivity costs and software updates for.. how long?

I'm not sure EV's are the brilliant solution to modern transport, entertainment perhaps but little to nothing to do with modern or futuristic transport.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

That's a corpo problem, not an EV problem. They could very easily make a perfectly fine EV that isn't a shitty motorized "smart device", if they chose to. But they aren't. The EV push just happened to coincide with the global ramping up of automotive enshittification that had already begun for all cars regardless of their energy source.

[–] DSN9@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

Yes of course, electric motors are by and far more reliable, stronger, faster, cleaner, quieter, less polluting, simpler, easier to repair, cheaper.. should I continue..

Electric vehicles on the other hand 😅

[–] DSN9@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If you want to be a billionaire go for it. There's literally no competition in this segment and everyone wants it.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I'm keeping a skeptical eye on them. I really like the concept obviously but remaining cautious for a number of reasons.

Obviously as the other replies mention, Jeff Bezos is one of the initial investors, but that's also true of Rivian. The important distinction is you don't have to get the massive tablet computer/nav/infotainment system that would be susceptible to these OTA updates.

Another reason is I was looking through available jobs that they were hiring for and a lot were AI-centric. It was unclear as to why, but obviously that just doesn't sit right. Regardless of whether they use it for customer support, automotive design, or infotainment embedding, I can't imagine a good reason and it was more than one type of position.

[–] Evrala@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm hopeful for a future awd version.

I have no interest in driving a rear wheel drive in the snow.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Same here but also I don’t want a truck nor something with that low range. Aside from being not what I’m interested in , the “blank slate” concept is compelling enough to be very interesting. I’m definitely going to follow this.

For everyone reflexively hating on this “Bezos Mobile”, I’m well aware of the reputation Amazon built for itself. However they are promising something people could own. For a reasonable price. And even customize. Instead of jumping right to negativity, this warrants some optimism

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I picture an electric car with almost no dashboard at all. Just one dial for speed and another for remaining charge along with your odometer if you feel you must have that info. Maybe estimated mileage, but even that’s just spare info to someone who’s used to a classic fuel gauge.

In a car, the interior should fall away and the car should become an extension of the driver. Only by feeling the need to preserve the car do you drive with the necessary attention to protect yourself.

People seem to treat cars like roaming living rooms instead of the farm equipment they really are.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

An American worker spending 1hr each way commuting to an 8hr+1hr lunch job is spending 2 out of 7 of their free hours in this machine. It's understandable that the demand for their vehicle to not be an oppressive environment would arise.

But I do agree that not all cars should be packed with these superfluous amenities

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

My 2001 Tacoma get like 24 mpg I think, been awhile since I did the math. Anyways it does all you said, got a tape player crank windows, and a bench controlled by 2 springs and 2 levers.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn’t satisfy the “crumple zone that is not my face” requirement.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago

I've been in a crash in a 1995 Toyota 4runner which used more or less the same body, head on into the back of a truck at about 50 due to break failure. I can assure you that old Toyotas are about as safe as you can get without it being modern and even then it's a relatively minimum difference. A lot of the increase in safety started to happen with cars around 2000-2005 which given the lag time for a lot of these feature to see it in statistics means that that era of car is pretty damned decent.

Also it wasn't my 4runner mine had its engine self destruct due to a shitty rebuild.

[–] tatermangia@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ineos Grenadier is close...still waiting on the aftermarket to come up with reprogramming tools

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ineos Grenadier

That is 86K. What the fuck. Everything I own is not worth 86k.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The Slate EV is supposed to come in mid-$20k range. Doesn't even come with a stereo, you get your own that fits in the space, or just zip tie a Bluetooth speaker somewhere. Refreshingly utilitarian, I think things should be modular.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It’s Bezos sponsored, so take the good PR work with a grain of salt given the state of everything he and Amazon have touched

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Ah goddamn it.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Wait, no speakers either?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

My 2014 Kia Rio has crank windows, no cruise control, 6-spd manual trans. No touchscreens--only buttons.
Car is very slow (1.6L non-turbo) but gets ~36mpg average. I've gotten as much as 40 when actually driving for mpg.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 5 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I think they were doing the Nissan Versa like that for a while too. But it's definitely not common and should be for cars that aren't economy-boxes. And just to lay my shit out, I guess, my progression was: 1991 Plymouth Acclaim, 1990 Chevy Caprice Classic (loved that car), 2000 Chevy Monte Carlo (it blew up!), 2007 Hyundai Tucson, 2012 Hyundai Tucson.

I AM in the market for a new car...eventually. Have replace the engine on this one already and know it's on its last legs. But I don't see anything out there that I actually like. I kinda liked the Challenger, I guess...but I honestly am thinking about going back to cars from the 90s/80s again. I legit miss my Caprice.

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 1 points 12 hours ago

My 2016 versa is crank windows, no power locks, no cruise control, 5-speed manual transmission, no touch screen/complicated electronics in the dash. It’s been really nice minus I do miss cruise control.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

Fuck dude, I drove 94 Acclaim across the country, and it was a pos then, but I miss that car. My current is a 05 Sierra, barebones, not even a radio anymore, I really like that it doesn't have much to break, and it's decently cheap to fix still

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A friend of mine had a Caprice Classic. Such a good car. It was soft and smooth and the economical 305 V8 made good torque while still getting good mpg!

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

It was a boat on wheels. But mine only got 7MPG. And that "twilight sentinel" nonsense never worked right. It did have some decent pickup for its size though.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh wow. The one my friend had got almost 20. He gave me a hard time because it got better mileage than my Jeep XJ of the time.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gorkur@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

20mpg doesn't really sound that far fetched for a 305 if you're mostly doing highway. Mine was a '78 and got around 14 in the city when just commuting. That thing could drink a lot more with a heavier foot though, lol

Maybe yours was a 350?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

For a 350 to get 7mpg it would have to be a race built engine or simply run like garbage. I don't even know how you could get a 305 to get that poor mileage but 🤷‍♂️

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A 1.6 in a car that light isn't all that slow. That's what, nine seconds? Not a race car, but cars used to be so much slower.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

Yes, slow by modern (and my) standards but compared to older cars it's quite good.
And while peak power is low it makes decent torque in the midrange and is tuned well for daily driving.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

My manual transmission Subaru Impreza has Android Auto and a Reverse Camera. That's the most advanced part of the car. It's a dinosaur otherwise, with a transmission and drivetrain that debuted in 1999 and an engine that's rough but reliable. The instrument cluster has two gauges - speed and RPM. The rest are on a calculator LCD that displays numbers for fuel and miles travelled, and a billion different danger lights that tell you if there's a problem somewhere. It also has electric windows and door locks. And cruise.

The problems the car has as it gets older are none of the electrical bits - they all work fine. It's the rear wheel bearings, suspension bushings, and center differential that wear out over time. Ironically, the most basic, mechanical parts.

[–] nailingjello@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

2018, so it's a 5th gen. They moved it to the Global Platform, so it's bigger and fatter. Ever since the WRC changed their rules (2016) to force a transverse drivetrain (like front wheel drive cars) for rally cars, that rule basically wrote Subaru out of the WRC.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

You and me both.

Where are the shops retrofitting decent cars with electric engines? Gimme that EV 911 from 1988. . . for . . . 11 thousand? Okay fifteen.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 14 hours ago

I had to buy a 2008 car to get these things you listed

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Back camera, cruise control, no radio (data, fm, or am), no stupid fucking touchscreen interface, a dedicated phone holder, and I’m happy. My phone has plenty of sounds to play while I drive and I’ve literally never needed anything a car touchscreen has offered.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

While I tend to agree with most people here, simpler is better and fuck touchscreens in cars, but I do prefer to have a functioning AM/FM radio. It doesn't have to be anything fancy, hell it doesn't even need USB/MP3/CD player or anything else, but living in a hurricane prone area, I like to be able to get emergency news reports even in the event the cell towers go out.

Katrina was no fun yo, especially when we found out the hard way that a chunk of the eastbound Interstate 10 bridge had collapsed. We sure could have used a working radio to find stuff like that out...

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I almost did something like this for my 1995 Exploder. Y'know how you can buy a crate engine and then *simply drop in a new engine? There are some companies that make electric motors that interface with your transmission and now you have an old vehicle with a new motor!

Before I could make any major decisions like that, though, one of my neighbor's told me that his friend had been looking for that exact same year and color Explorer after she lost her car in a flood, so I gave it to her. I never really got too far in my research, so I don't know much about the real cost and extent of work involved in these electric crate engines.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You can't just throw a crate engine in. My current car (2012 Hyundai Tucson) is a "California engine". My family is in auto, and we went to a guy who replaced the engines on my uncle's fleet. $6500 because the engine itself was so hard to source and replace with all the bullshit sensors, and an extra $1k for the rental I needed for 2 weeks while they tracked an engine down.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Oh, hahaha, sorry. The asterisk in front of the "simply" was meant to reference some fake fine print. I totally forgot to add that, so congratulations! You've unlocked the hidden fine print!

^*Process description does not include all necessary steps to make motor or car functional. Commenter assumes no responsibility and should not be considered as a reliable source of information.^

Also, I totally feel you on the engine replacement woes. I had an engine rebuilt by Jasper on a mid-90s 4-Runner. I was told that this would ultimately be easier, cheaper, and have better warranty than a new engine. It took over 2 years before I could go more than a week before visiting my mechanic with another issue caused by the incredibly invasive procedure. 4 years later, the block cracked and I just took what I could get at auction.