this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
567 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

17048 readers
2113 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The real question isn't if the universe ends...

It's if the genie magic expands outward from the source at the speed of light, or if it's instantaneous everywhere, which would allow information to be transmitted faster than the speed of light, allowing for violations of causality, and destroying our fundamental understanding of the universe before we all died.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This assumes the genie doesn't have access to some weird higher-reality or higher-"dimensional" power. For instance, if the universe is a simulation, then perhaps the genie has access to a console.

[–] NichtElias@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And you don't call discovering that the universe is a simulation "destroying our fundamental understanding of the universe"?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

Yes and no. Nothing that we know about the universe preclude it being a simulation, so learning only that it is a simulation is more expanding out fundamental understanding of the universe. However, as things stand, we are pretty damn convinced that nothing violates causality while following the internal rules of the universe, so if the genie did that without invoking some power we might call "outside the universe", then we learn that the universe can internally violate causality - THAT might destroy our fundamental understanding of the universe.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

real question, is there a difference?

In theory yes, but for any observer, it won't matter and it's all the same to them, as they cannot observe any difference in either case.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not if the universe is inside the genie.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's genies all the way down.

[–] Mist101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really fun to think about taking a speed of light ride.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You wouldn’t have any time to appreciate it.

[–] Mist101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well, it's not a bowl.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. It's inside you. For listening to the genie.

[–] banause@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

The genie didn't do anything. It was you the whole time!

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

The fermion number conservation would be violated anyways.