this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
135 points (100.0% liked)

news

24380 readers
971 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is of the Freedom Band performing at the end of the Second National Congress of the Socialist Movement of Ghana, sourced from this article. The same article contains most of the information used in the preamble below.


A little over a week ago, the Socialist Movement of Ghana concluded its second National Delegates Congress in Aburi, gathering 300 delegates from across the country. There, they deepened their commitment to the working class of Ghana and committed to intensifying political education and organization at the grassroots. The SMG itself decided to not electorally contest the 2024 elections in Ghana, but still presented a manifesto, and nonetheless managed to get two SMG members parliamentary seats in the National Democratic Congress.

Anyway, back to the National Delegates Congress: the delegates agreed that the Western imperialist system is now under a profound crisis, in which the likely future is a heightening of brutality, chaos, and resource plundering - a future which must be resisted and organized against.

To summarize their various statements and condemnations:

  • Inside Ghana: a commitment to women's rights, youth empowerment, and environmental protection.
  • A condemnation of the resource plundering of the Democratic Republic of the Congo by imperialist powers.
  • A salute to the people of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, in their campaign against outside imperial control in the Sahel.
  • A condemnation of Morocco's illegal occupation of the Western Sahara, and a call for the UN to identify the independence of the Sahwari people.
  • A strong condemnation of Israel's genocidal atrocities and massive terrorist operations against nearby countries, and support for Palestinian independence.
  • Support for the people of Haiti against outside imperial domination.
  • A call for the end of the blockade on Cuba and their removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list.
  • Solidarity with Maduro and the people of Venezuela against the United States.
  • A rejection of all imperialist aggression and sanctions against Iran.
  • A condemnation of NATO's decades-long military expansion eastwards towards Russia, especially as it has now resulted in massive devastation and risks a third world war.
  • And finally, a commitment to Pan Africanism and international solidarity with all oppressed peoples around the world.

A platform I think we all can agree to!


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 27 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

The Invasion of Panama, Manuel Noriega and Venezuela:

Who was Manuel Noriega?In 1903, after Colombia refused to grant the United States the terms it demanded for a canal, President Theodore Roosevelt’s administration militarily backed a separatist movement. They wanted a nation whose primary purpose was to serve as a host for a strategic American waterway.

The 1903 treaty, signed not by a Panamanian but by a French lobbyist, granted the U.S. control over a ten-mile-wide strip of land, this became the Canal Zone, a segregated, American-run colonial enclave. The white American settlers, known as "Zonians" lived in a subsidized colony with their own schools, police, and stores, enjoying privileges denied to the Panamanians who lived on the other side of the fence. The Colombia diplomat at the OAS named the Zone Fence the "Berlin Wall of Latin America". The early Panamanian governments were little more than puppet goverments, content to manage the country for the benefit of a small elite while remaining subservient to Washington and the powerful Canal Zone authorities.

Decades of resentment and national humiliation boiled over on January 9, 1964. When Panamanian students attempted to fly their nation's flag alongside the U.S. flag in the Canal Zone, they were met with violence from Zonian settlers and police. The ensuing riots saw U.S. troops open fire on unarmed Panamanians, killing over 28 students and civilians. This event, known as Martyrs' Day, and caused a surge in Panamanian nationalism and made the return of the Canal an non-negotiable demand.

The goverment's failure to achieve sovereignty led to the 1968 Panamanian coup d'état, which, after a brief Junta, brought Colonel Omar Torrijos and his civilian allies to power. He established a left-leaning civic-military dictatorship that, while authoritarian, was deeply populist and nationalist. Investing in housing, education, and land reform, and brought poor working class Panamanians and minorities into positions of power for the first time. In foreign policy, he was anti-imperialist, offering support to left-wing governments and guerrillas like the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and challenging U.S. hegemony in the region. His singular goal was to reclaim the Canal, a feat he achieved with the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties in 1977, which set a date for the final handover of the Canal to Panama.

In 1981, Torrijos died in a plane crash under highly suspicious circumstances. Many in Latin America believe he was assassinated by the CIA, which viewed his independent nationalism and support for leftist movements as a threat. His death created a power vacuum filled by his intelligence chief, Manuel Noriega.

Noriega was a very different leader. For years, he had been a key CIA asset and informant, a crucial link in America's covert operations in Central America. At the same time, he built a criminal enterprise, deepening his ties with drug cartels like Pablo Escobar's Medellín Cartel, a fact the U.S. was fully aware of and for years complicit in.

Manuel Noriega was a opportunist with no allegiance beyond his own power and wealth. For decades, he was a prized asset of the CIA, a useful strongman in a region Washington was determined to control. But Noriega was loyal to no one he played a dangerous double game, selling intelligence and services to both his CIA handlers and Cuba, profiting from the very Cold War tensions that ravaged Latin America. He also betrayed the Sandinistas in Nicaragua while posing as a fellow Latin American leader, Noriega actively sabotaged their popular revolution. He allowed Panama to be used as a conduit for the U.S.-backed Contras and provided intelligence to undermine the leftist government, all to curry favor with his bosses in Washington. He betrayed regional solidarity for personal gain, helping U.S. imperialism crush a genuine people's movement. Noriega was never a revolutionary or a nationalist.

By the late 1980s, the unpopular Noriega had become too public a liability and was becoming increasingly unreliable. As the U.S. turned on him, he went rogue, attempting to rebrand himself as a nationalist and "anti-imperialist" leader in the likes of the popular Torrijos. He created paramilitary units called the Dignity Battalions to intimidate political opponents and project an image of popular resistance against U.S. aggression. This crisis culminated in the 1989 U.S. invasion.

The InvasionIn March 1988, Noriega's forces resisted an attempted coup d'etat against his regime. As relations with the USA continued to deteriorate, Noriega appeared to shift his Cold War allegiance toward the Soviet bloc, soliciting and receiving military aid from Cuba, Nicaragua, and Libya. USA military planners began preparing contingency plans to invade Panama.

The situation escalated throughout 1989. After the October coup attempt against Noriega, led by Major Moisés Giroldi, The U.S. offered not a lot of support, ensuring its failure. As if the USA didn't just want Noriega gone, they wanted to manage his replacement and dismantle any vestige of an independent Panamanian military.

In response to growing USA. pressure, Noriega created the "Dignity Battalions," paramilitary units of civilian supporters, and postured as a nationalist standing up to American imperialism. In the May 1989 presidential election, the opposition candidate, Guillermo Endara, was recognized as the election winner by the US goverment. Noriega, unwilling to relinquish power, brutally suppressed the opposition and annulled the results. While an authoritarian act, this provided the U.S. with the perfect moral justification for an invasion it was already planning.

Cornered, Noriega made desperate gestures toward the Soviet Union and Cuba. This was less a genuine ideological movement and more a last-ditch effort to find new allies. For the USA this was a gift. It allowed them to dust off the old Cold War playbook and manufacture the fear of "losing Panama to the Soviets," a baseless but effective piece of propaganda for a public conditioned to fear communism.

The final pretexts were handed to the USA on a silver platter. On December 15, 1989, Noriega's national assembly passed a resolution declaring that a "state of war" existed with the United States. A day later, an incident at a Panama Defense Forces (PDF) checkpoint resulted in the death of an unarmed U.S. Marine, First Lieutenant Robert Paz, under really suspecious circumstances.

This was the spark the White House was waiting for. On December 20, the U.S. unleashed overwhelming and brutal force. The invasion targeted not just military installations but devastated civilian neighborhoods like El Chorrillo, resulting in thousands of civilian casualties that far exceeded the official U.S. count. While Noriega himself was deeply unpopular with many Panamanians who were tired of his corruption and repression, the invasion was a traumatic national wound inflicted by a foreign power.

After days of intense fighting, Noriega was captured and flown to the U.S. for trial. The most significant outcome of the invasion was not the "restoration" of democracy, but the complete dissolution of the Panama Defense Forces. With this act, the USA eliminated the only institution in Panama capable of challenging its control over the Canal Zone, achieving its primary strategic objective.

The U.S. installed the winner of the 1989 election, Guillermo Endara, as president. However, subsequent administrations under presidents Ernesto Pérez Balladares and Martín Torrijos (both from Noriega's own PRD party) were staffed with many of Noriega's former cronies and political allies. The invasion did not cleanse the alledged corrupt system, it simply removed an inconvenient leader and ensured the new power structure would be unconditionally compliant with U.S. interests.

Although we cannot rule out the possibility of a US invasion of Venezuela (especially since Trump became president), the situation is very different from that of Panama (a country that together with the US invasion of the DR in 1965, people like to compare to). For now, the US seems to want to continue pressuring Venezuela by attacking ships near Venezuelan-controlled waters, and Venezuela does not seem to be backing down at the moment. The same is true of Venezuela's regional allies, Colombia, Brazil, and Suriname, which have condemned the US presence in the region. We will see if the US attempts to attack a target within Venezuela and how the Venezuelan military and Latin American countries will react to this.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 9 points 10 hours ago

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum invoked her country's Constitution and the principles of non-intervention and self-determination of peoples when questioned about the US military deployment off the coast of Venezuela.

According to Reuters, three US warships equipped with guided missiles would arrive on the South American country's coast as part of an effort to combat threats from Latin American drug cartels, according to sources familiar with the matter. When asked at a press conference about this military deployment and relations between Venezuela and the US, Sheinbaum replied, “No to interventionism,” and also referred to other legal principles contained in the Mexican Constitution.

“It is clearly established in our Constitution and it is always our position: the self-determination of peoples, non-intervention, and the peaceful resolution of disputes,” she said, arguing that everything is always resolved through dialogue.