this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
92 points (81.9% liked)

Firefox

21018 readers
325 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox app on android. Never seen this before until today. But Firefox is now putting ads in the app?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TuxEnthusiast@sopuli.xyz 0 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You expect them to work for free?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 42 minutes ago

All software beneath my web browser is also free, and none of it would dare.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They get donations. Lots of them. And it is open source. I don't expect ads in firefox, no

[–] ashleythorne@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

They get some small donations from some users... and Google.

It being open source means nothing. Open source developers still need to eat. It just means that you could remove all the things you don't like.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't get ads in Blender 3D.

Or Krita.

Or OBS.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You are severely underestimating the development burden of a modern web engine.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

You're severely underestimating the development burden of an industry standard 3D modelling program, much less the Swiss army knife that Blender 3D is.

If The Blender Foundation can operate with donations from big corporations like NVIDIA and AMD without selling out, then Mozilla has no excuse.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They're very different models though, currently blender has a bunch of sponsors and companies who contribute, firefox doesn't have that, because the project is structured differently, and it's a different type of software.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

They're both mature software packages with a ton of features. There are two gigantic obligations that a browser & especially web engine have that creative software don't: massive security exposure and constantly changing web standards. Both create development burdens that are both non-trivial and time-sensitive. Many FOSS projects update at their own pace, which is simply not an option for a modern, feature-complete web engine.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Mozilla gets fucking loads. Way more than it can spend on Firefox. Like a certain online encyclopdia.

https://nerdschalk.com/85-of-mozillas-revenue-at-risk-firefoxs-survival-threatened-by-potential-loss-of-google-search-deal/

Ads are greedy, unwanted, and symptomatic of the culture there. They can fuck right off imo. And most open source software manages to avoid ads, why do you think that is?

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And freeloading is the reason why we have an ad-based economy... Do you donate? Do you work for free?

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have worked for free on OS projects, I have donated to OS projects. None of this changes my opinion that Firefox should not have ads

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Then what should it have? You haven't donated to it, so what do you do?

[–] ashleythorne@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Mozilla gets fucking loads

From Google. And if that deal disappeared, Mozilla would probably go bankrupt or rely on a worse deal from another provider. Neither would be good for Firefox development.

It makes sense that Mozilla wants to branch out, diversify. It just sucks that they're terrible at doing it. Would have been cool if Mozilla operated like Proton or any other privacy-orientated service provider.

most open source software manages to avoid ads, why do you think that is

Because they have scruples and usually have financial issues as a result.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Firefox would be better off without Mozilla at this stage. The donations mozilla receives from individuals supporting firefox would pay for a large dev team easily. Google is a total red-herring and this money is spraffed on exec pay afaict, and they should be ending this today, as has been said by many other people

[–] ashleythorne@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If that was true, then why don't we have a fork of Firefox being developed by the community that is better than Firefox?

The only thing we have now are forks of Firefox. Sure, some are better, but all still rely on Mozilla's upstream contributions. If Mozilla stopped supporting Firefox, these forks would be dead. They just add some features and UI changes. They are not working on web standards, fixing implementations of those standards, or security fixes.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So you donate, do you? Or are you working for free in general?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I contribute to a major Bionicle fan project. Yes, for free. I've been offered a reward for my work on said fan project. I refused it.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago

Oh, so you do free work on a project that doesn't do anything good for the internet, the internet users, internet freedom, and so forth - and that makes it okay to demand that you are provided with free software, that competes against multi-billion-dollar companies?