this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
189 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42260 readers
808 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/50130760

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 29 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

If signal pulls out of Europe we're in a pretty fucked state. Apps like signal will be reduced to operations it a few fringe countries eventually

[–] sadfitzy@ttrpg.network 2 points 8 hours ago

We still have Matrix.

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Signal is nice because it has a pretty good adoption rate even with non techies (which is why they've been mentioned by name in the chat control proposal). But privacy enthusiasts will still have briar/simplechat/xmpp. Those aren't centralised like Signal and will be a lot harder to regulate

[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

ChatControl 2.0, if passed means your entire device is backdoored so it doesn’t matter what apps you installl, they can get your info pre-encryption

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Custom roms is your best bed at that point. I do use GOS already.

[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

It's great as long as you can guarantee that the person you're communicating on the receiving side does the same. Otherwise it's useless as your messages will be read on the receiving device. In practice it will make private communication extremely cumbersome and niche.

Also, the authorities can backdoor your custom ROM device at will, when seized.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 16 hours ago

I mean I don't see them back dooring GOS anytime soon. But your right both ends need to have a custom ROM.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Steganography. There’s more than one way to protect your communication.

And encryption in transit is better than no encryption at all (assuming the baddies don’t already have full access to your phone data).

[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

assuming the baddies don’t already have full access to your phone data

That's the whole point of Chat Control 2.0

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Not quite; Chat Control hearkens back to Apple’s doomed attempt at on-device CSAM filtering - the idea is that on-device images and message contents would be scanned for known hashes. This means a nation state could go fishing on devices for known content, but it wouldn’t allow them to indiscriminately sift through all the content at rest — they’d have to know what they were looking for.

That’s where the steganography comes in, because the hash based approach will fail if the content they’re looking for is obscured in some manner.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Custom roms is your best bed

Didn't know they come with sleeping facilities. They're so versatile nowadays! SCNR

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You won't be able to install those apps soon after Android bans sideloading of apps that aren't signed, or bans sideloading of apps that are not from the playstore itself.

What then?

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think privacy enthusiasts use vanilla Android. People will stick to Lineage/Graphene for as long as it works and then switch to something like Postmarket. It's already in a state where it's rough but usable.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Europe: Companies can't lock down your operating system.

Also Europe: Companies must force back doors into their operating systems.

I wonder how long those two things can coexist.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well, Google’s current behaviour is already putting the future existence of F-Droid into question.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We need FOSS phones badly and in numbers that manufacturing isn't horrible. That is until our governments force carriers not to connect them.

If I could find a reasonably priced 8" Linux tablet, I'd sell my phone and buy a cellular wifi AP.

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 1 points 39 minutes ago

You can spoof IMEI and pretend your phone is an old iPhone. Carriers wouldn't know.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago

Yes, but not everyone they want to talk to will go through that effort. It's already hard enough to convince someone to download another messaging app that they will only use with you.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 0 points 10 hours ago

"privacy enthusiasts" not everybody can do that. also remember that privacy is a spectrum.