this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4288 readers
136 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Yvette Cooper and Jonathan Reynolds previously ruled this out, and it's obvious that it will do nothing to prevent immigrants from working illegally. Not to mention that the fact that we don't allow successful asylum claimants to work is repugnant.

So the question is: who leant on him? Who is it that really wants this? Is Palantir going to get the contract, by any chance?

[–] ambitiousslab@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think it will be Oracle. They massively fund the Tony Blair Institute, and Blair has always had a love of ID cards.

So Larry Ellison instead of Peter Thiel. Another foreign billionaire who totally has our interests at heart.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe he does really think this is a way to appeal to those who want controls on immigration, but without doing something too tough, which would alienate his MPs.

I think he's probably making a mistake though. This digital ID policy seems to be very unpopular, with both the left and the right. The petition that opposes digital ID now has 1.7 million signatures, and it will probably get a few more.

Hanlon's Razor, sure, but I don't buy it. He isn't stupid.

Just like the Online Safety Act, it isn't going to do much for its stated purpose, but it's going to be very effective for helping the government find and stop people organising protests.