this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
141 points (97.3% liked)

World News

37711 readers
185 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Russia has violated Estonian airspace four times already this year, which is unacceptable in itself, but today’s violation, during which three fighter jets entered our airspace, is unprecedentedly brutal

So has Russia already been doing this for a while and the EU is only now making a big deal out of it? Or is this an actual escalation?

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unprecedentedly brutal? They flew in and flew back out get a fucking grip lol

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unlike the bombs NATO keeps giving to Ukraine, which are gentle and caring

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Really don’t understand how it can be Ukraine’s fault that Russia invaded it in order to take it over, but Ok you guys do you I guess 🤷‍♂️

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (50 children)

It’s not only Ukraine’s fault. It’s been a concerted effort by NATO powers over decades. Previously:

The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine:

 
NATO expansion:

 
NATO in general:

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love that you have a list of references! But of course they are all ignored because engaging with them might change someone's beliefs and, no disrespect intended, changing a deeply held belief is difficult, scary, and can lead to a sort of cascade of changes as ones world view crumbles. Which in and of itself can feel devastating.

[–] SeizeTheBeans@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

This is all true, but even if the person being exposed to the reality of the situation wholly rejects it at the time of exposure, it still often plants seeds that can later and over time germinate into actual doubt about those deeply-held but demonstrably false beliefs. It may seem like a fool's errand in the moment to try to use evidence to correct a person who believes a thing for emotional reasons and often it is, but it also can be the first, second, or third cracks in what is actually a shaky foundation that looks sturdy to an outside observer. And even if it has absolutely no effect on the person being corrected, in places like this, there are other people reading, and among them could easily be those who are open to having their minds changed though we'd never know it.

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Similar actions has been made by both sides:

  • In October 2023, four NATO reconnaissance aircraft (an RQ-4 Global Hawk, a Bombardier Challenger 650 Artemis, and two P-8A Poseidons) conducted flights approximately 150 km from the Crimean coast.
  • In August 2023, MQ-9 "Reaper" and TB2 "Bayraktar" drones conducted reconnaissance over the Black Sea but were intercepted and diverted by Russian Aerospace Forces fighters.
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

back in the 80's i learned that this was an almost routine thing that was done to test their opponents response capabilities; is this still the case?

[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

Yes, the practice of testing an adversary's response capabilities through deliberate or accidental airspace violations persists, although its context, methods, and participants have evolved significantly since the Cold War.

This is exemplified by two flights of U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers, capable of carrying nuclear weapons, over the Black Sea near the Crimean coast on September 4th and 14th, 2020.

  • On September 4th, the aircraft took off from RAF Fairford in the UK. They flew over the Netherlands, Germany, and Poland before entering Ukrainian airspace and approaching Crimea from the north. The bombers came within approximately 40-53 km of the Crimean coast near Melitopol and Genichesk. They were escorted by Ukrainian Su-27 and MiG-29 fighters. Russian fighter jets did not intercept them, as the B-52Hs did not violate Russian airspace.

  • On September 14th, three B-52H bombers again departed from RAF Fairford. They crossed over Ukraine to the Black Sea, heading toward Turkey, and flew within about 37.5 km of the Crimean coast near the village of Mayak. Concurrently, two Royal Air Force Sentinel R.1 reconnaissance aircraft were operating near Russian borders over the Black Sea. In response, Russian air defense forces scrambled two Su-27 fighters on duty and a pair of Su-30 fighters from the Southern Military District. The Russian crews identified the aerial targets as U.S. Air Force B-52H strategic bombers and escorted them over the Black Sea.

The Ukrainian government in Kyiv confirmed these flights. On Monday, September 14th, the Ukrainian Air Force Command announced that three U.S. B-52H strategic bombers had re-entered the country's airspace, escorted by Ukrainian fighter jets. In a statement on Facebook, the command noted: "The B-52s, under the cover of Ukrainian fighter jets, headed for the Black Sea for joint actions with our partners in the field of collective security. Such patrols will be regular, as the B-52 missions in the skies of Ukraine are part of the long-planned deployment of six B-52s at the UK's RAF Fairford."

Source:

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

How is flying over Ukrainian airspace the same thing as Russia flying over the airspace of NATO nations?

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 8 points 2 days ago

Neither of those incidents involve fighter jets and neither are over Russian airspace.

load more comments (1 replies)