rando895

joined 8 months ago
[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

There's a good chance it will be used for the declaration of a special military operation. And the Americans will finally get to invade Iran.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It is if you finesse it enough

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Even if it's true that people are stupid (which is also a narrative pushed which ensures apathy) that is completely irrelevant. Why is it that these apparently stupid people believe the "wrong thing"? Well, it's the same as always. The capitalists are better organized than us, and those supporting them know of no other alternatives. So for a successful revolution the oppressed class needs to get better organized (which IS happening, albeit slowly).

If YOU feel apathetic, please find a socialist/communist/radical left party/group and join it. It can help immensely

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

Lol I have so many conversations like this. Someone was saying a bunch of people got laid off at their job during covid and they almost lost their house. I said something like "it's a shame that they didn't just temporarily decrease everyone's hours so you all still had work. I mean, the work was going to come back eventually".

And they of course agreed

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think many will obey the decision, just not the USA, Canada, terf island, the E.U., you know the usual culprits for not following international law.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Within at least physics, there is still a lot of importance placed on "prestigious" journals like Phys Rev. So it's not so simple. Why would authors trust something published in the "Journal for Comradely Science"? It makes it very difficult to start something just due to the scientific cultural inertia.

Realistically it is 100% possible. But it's the same issue the rest of the working class runs into: insufficient organization. The push for open source in its current form is just a way to make science open without affecting the profits of these huge journals. It costs the author to publish in a journal (which usually means the government allocates x-dollars within grants to pay for publishing). So it's a farce tbh.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 month ago

If there are education and experience requirements imposed on judicial candidates, and then they are elected, this is not an issue. Because those who are elected are accountable to those who elected them

(provided they can be removed from.power by the same people, which is one of those "checks and balances" Western "democracies " have imposed so we can't remove them).

That way you have professionals/experts who are accountable to the people. Obviously elections can always be tampered with and influenced by powerful and moneyed interests, but by assuming this is true and then making it the default is a bit daft tbh.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's like... 4 or 5 times the speed of sound at sea level so... There would be a bit of a boom.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

The real question is if you slapped hard enough to raise the temperature to 74C (undergrad clearly doesn't cook), what would the temperature of your hand be? And for the engineers: how far up your arm would you have to measure before the temperature returned to normal body temperature? And for the bio/kin/nursing/premed students: how much would need to be amputated?

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 month ago

I mean, private ownership by those who don't do the work or consume the product, yet get to make the decisions is to blame, yes. And that is capitalism by definition so... Capitalism is to blame....

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago

The only identity politics I want to see is us against the ruling elite. Everything else is sparkling fascism.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago

And the Democrats are fighting to outlaw it too right?

view more: next ›