this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
103 points (99.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5379 readers
796 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Repeat something enough and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. First it was "Jeremy Corbyn is unelectable", now it's "Nigel Farage is on course to be the next Prime Minister". Same thing.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nigel Farage as PM is more of a historical inevitability at this point unless something really big happens, but the media is absolutely complicit.

[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

No, it's just the historical march of fascism. Fascism in the UK could theoretically be stopped, but so far I haven't heard of enough real backlash to seriously consider the possibility.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Lastangel@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun thought experiment: have you ever met anyone who has replied to opinion polls?

I asked my dear 80 year old mother that a while ago, she hadn't. I haven't.

They are generally conducted by phone, cold calling landlines, or by someone going door to door with a clipboard.

Many unofficial (but still very influencial, including gov.uk) polls are online, and users have to complete hundreds of them to get a nominal payment, £5 I believe.

Now imagine the sort of person who answers their ringing landline/ door and says 'why yes, stranger, yes I do have 10 minutes to discuss my voting intentions', and you have the entire 'over 40 years old' demographic represented in these results.

Imagine someone who has actively sought out survey websites and sits though at least 100, over 6 months or so, for a tiny amount of pocket money - or even weirder, someone who just decided to do it anyway - and you have the entire 'under 40 years old' demographic in these results.

And now, thinking of those door-answerers and survey-clickers, imagine how colourful and exciting their lives must be, and then ask yourself what possible incentive they have to tell the truth when absolutely nobody will ever know if they liven up the tedium slightly by claiming to be a 45 year old self made millionaire with 12 lovely children all planning to vote Jedi in the next election.

And that is why opinion polls always come out way, way more fringe than the reality ever is. Because normal people do not answer them unless they have a strong opinion or an incentive, and those with an incentive generally have no incentive to be honest.

(For reference, I'm not dunking on people who have done these things. I spent about a year answering yougov surveys until it dawned on me that it worked out at less than 5p an hour. If you're bored or just want to contribute to the national knowledge pool, awesome, but you probably already know you're not exactly an average voter)

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Maybe. But if you look at the local elections from May:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yg467m8mjo

...Reform got 31% of the votes cast. The chart of polls is pretty close, and actually slightly underrates them for May 2025. Now, maybe voting in the general election and local elections have different groups of people show up. I know that here in the US, that's a factor for midterm elections. That could affect outcomes in the general election. But...my guess is that the chart probably is at least in the neighborhood of being representative of their support in society. Or, maybe more accurately, of their support among those who go to vote.

[–] ambitiousslab@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Is there anything the lib dems and greens do to get more of the dropping labour support? It's scary to me how little of that drop has gone to the left.