this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
244 points (99.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13999 readers
1200 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
244
Livethread: Charlie Kirk Shot (and killed) at Utah Event (apnews.com)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by deforestgump@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
596 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Update: potential shooter in custody (https://x.com/justin_hicken/status/1965848958464569704)

Update 2: There is footage which shows Charlie Kirk taking what seems to be a fatal gunshot to the neck. I will not post it here.

Update 3: Hasan Piker watched the clip on stream and confirmed that Kirk took the fatal shot. Piker was visibly shaken as he was supposed to debate Kirk at Dartmouth University in 15 days.

Update 4: Kirk has been hospitalized (https://www.foxnews.com/us/charlie-kirk-shot-utah-event-hospitalized)

Update 3:17 ET: BBC is reporting that the gunman is NOT in custody (https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt?post=asset%3Ac035788b-e6fb-4fbc-9265-7d60e5e027af#post)

3:27 ET: BBC now reports from university security that gunman is in custody:

3:47 ET: CBS Reporter @JenniferJJacobs: "A Turning Point USA official says Charlie Kirk is at the hospital but "it doesn’t look good.” Confirmed Kirk was shot in the neck. @CBSNews" (https://x.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1965863480499868145)

3:48 ET: AP Reports that Charlie Kirk is in critical condition. (https://apnews.com/live/utah-valley-university-charlie-kirk-shooting-updates#00000199-3528-de36-a9f9-777f0f350000)

3:55 ET: Kirk was in a debate at the "Prove Me Wrong Table" (https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/10/us/charlie-kirk-shot-utah/37c9c0ac-f695-504a-8ff6-d9ab2a3078e1):

3:59 ET: Shot came from 200 yards away (https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt?post=asset%3Af64761ff-6c89-48a8-81b7-a975947a1f30#post)

4:04 ET: NYT: Old man in custody is NOT actually the shooter. The police have determined that a person who was taken into custody after the shooting was not actually the shooter, according to Scott Trotter, a university spokesman. The university had earlier said a suspect was in custody, and videos online showed an older man being detained by police officers. (https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/10/us/charlie-kirk-shot-utah/4ad76cd0-57e9-5b4a-b7b8-acb2e2a58026)

4:15 ET: Desert News Reporter: Utah Speaker Mike Schultz confirms Charlie Kirk is dead. (https://x.com/BrighamTomco/status/1965871381419352506)

4:17 ET: Suspect not in custody, University says (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/live-updates-shooting-charlie-kirk-event-utah-rcna230437/rcrd88079?canonicalCard=true)

4:26 ET: Real America's Voice is reporting that Charlie Kirk has died (https://x.com/willsommer/status/1965873708163346786)

4:29 ET:

4:42 ET:

4:46 ET:

4:55 ET:

5:00 ET: BBC What we know, what we don't:

5:50 ET:

6:04 ET:

  • AP what the videos show:

  • BBC recants earlier reporting about where the shot took place:

6:10 ET: Video surfaces on twitter of what appears to be a shooter on the roof of a building (https://x.com/doug_zimmer1/status/1965866141970215038)

6:15 ET:

6:25 ET:

6:32 ET:

Press Conference:

  • Utah Gov Cox says a "person of interest" is in custody but speaks to 'whoever did this' (Press Conf).
  • That person isn't suspect 'Zynn'.
  • Person in custody being charged with Obstruction of Justice
  • Kirk killed with single shot:
  • That was a weird fucking press conference. [6:42 ET]

NBC News Summary of Press Conference:

I think that's all I got for now folks! Thanks for following. [6:50 ET]

9:17 ET: AP reports no one is currently in custody:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 4 points 6 hours ago

They could have evidence that nails the shooter dead to rights in open court and just not know it or have announced it yet. They might have had their cell phone on the entire time but cops are going to take some time to track down all phones in the area and start looking more closely into those that were in the shooting area and either had no reason to be there or subsequently left the area. Needless to say anyone whose phone places them in that building as well as everyone normally in that building without a quality alibi of being elsewhere is going to be a suspect for some time to come if they don't find anyone else and they're going to be surveilling everyone but especially those with non-reactionary political beliefs for months to years. This is the type of thing they'll have someone from the local cops working on for at least two years even if all the trails go dead, just hunting down whoever was there, trying to find a slip-up. Given who he was FBI will probably also have at least one person working this for a year or more.

So it all really depends on how much evidence there is. Did they leave DNA they're certain belongs to the shooter (e.g. ruling out all other normal people who might have reason to be there for innocent reasons by testing them)? Do they have video with a clear shot of their face? Fingerprints? Do they find the weapon? Cell phone trace. Bragging about it on an 'encrypted' online chat that the NSA has monitored which causes them to home in using parallel construction and maybe just murder them in a raid? Does someone convert to become an Evangelical in 2 years and they saw the shooter and come forward to the cops to give a sketch and info about distinctive clothing they were wearing? Lots of things could happen.