this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
120 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

74994 readers
2810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Totally different. Anthropic could have bought all the books and trained on them. Pirating is a different topic.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Anthropic could have bought

You think buying the books would let them plagiarize ? That doesn't seem to be normal in the "book buying" process.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Given the judege in that case flat out rejected the claim that there was any infringement for works they had legally aquired, yes.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Doesn't really matter what I think, its a different concept than pirating. Hence a different thing than what was getting ruled on.

I mean AI or not look at it this way: if a company wanted to train their workers and pirated all the training manuals, piracy is the issue, not the training.