this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
1044 points (98.6% liked)

BestOfLemmy

9566 readers
217 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

So…..Your big take away here was defending the mediocre male who is at zero risk over a bumbling opinion .

Not even inkling of concern of how this impacts the vulnerable underage victims of the case and how these harmful opinions have been debasing them.

Well at least now we know where you really stand here on which hills you’re willing to die on .

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Wat? Did you reply to the wrong comment or something?

Defending a mediocre male (...)

I'm rationalising a persons reaction to a situation by trying to understand how they think.

Not even an inkling of concern (...)

I don't see how rationalising one persons train of thought says anything about my personal opinions or concerns about anything?

Now we know (...) which hills you're willing to die on.

This is really what confused me the most. What about my comment made you think there was even any hill in the vicinity to die on?