this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
114 points (98.3% liked)
science
21613 readers
318 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
More likely is the simple fact that Mars is closer in size and mass to The Moon, rather than The Earth
Mars is about twice the size of Earth's Moon which makes it half as volumous as earth. With that in mind it's not hard to imagine earth absorbing roughly a moons mass worth of hot angry rock would not increase the ambient temp in the core.
Yeah a lot of that impact energy is still retained as heat. Also it's though the collision that caused the moon was with an object about the size of Mars.
Astrophysics is a hobby. It is not my field but to my understanding it was a Mars ish size object and that's how we ended up with 2/3 of it folded into Earth and 1/3 plus some of Earths mass ejected into space to coalesce into the moon?
Mind you, I'm basing this off of some graphics I've seen and papers I've read years ago. Let me know if any of that sounds incorrect cuz I am not an authority.
Saw a short on that the other day. Current understanding is that the Earth's mantle formed the Moon and Theia formed Earth's core. Maybe it also brought water to Earth.