this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
114 points (98.3% liked)

science

21613 readers
300 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The findings, which are published in Nature, have important implications for our understanding of how Mars evolved. Billions of years ago, the planet may have had a thicker atmosphere that allowed liquid water to flow on the surface.

This thicker atmosphere may have been kept in place by a protective magnetic field, like the one Earth has. However, Mars lacks such a field today. Scientists have wondered whether the loss of this magnetic field led to the red planet losing its atmosphere to space over time and becoming the cold, dry desert it is today.

From residual magnetization in the crust, we think that Mars did once have a magnetic field, possibly from a core structure similar to that of Earth. However, scientists think that the core must have cooled and stopped moving at some point in its history.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Forester@pawb.social 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Makes one wonder if the only reason we still have a liquid core is the mass injected deep under the mantle during the massive impact that formed the moon probably significantly heated a lot of the mass.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A fairly well accepted theory is that the moon's gravitational pull (tides) do a lot to churn earth's molten core, that churning adds heat and the mantle is a fantastic insulator. So all together, the moon is probably what's keeping our liquid core hot. (And in turn, the liquid core is probably what gives us our magnetic field. And the magnetic field is what keeps our atmosphere from blowing out into space. So that's all pretty important)

That tidal churn effect may also be why we have plate tectonics, which by the way is absolutely necessary to support life as we know it. Without plate tectonics, heavier elements would all sink to the center of the earth, but those churning plates are always bringing a mix of elements back up to the surface. And without some of those heavy elements, carbon based life wouldn't be possible. Also, technology wouldn't really be possible either, because if you think those rare earth metals are rare now, just imagine if they weren't found in earth's crust at all.

I think we have a lot to thank the moon for, it's probably the thing that does the most to make Earth a livable planet. Basically, if the Earth is special, the Moon is why.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More likely is the simple fact that Mars is closer in size and mass to The Moon, rather than The Earth

[–] Forester@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Mars is about twice the size of Earth's Moon which makes it half as volumous as earth. With that in mind it's not hard to imagine earth absorbing roughly a moons mass worth of hot angry rock would not increase the ambient temp in the core.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah a lot of that impact energy is still retained as heat. Also it's though the collision that caused the moon was with an object about the size of Mars.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Astrophysics is a hobby. It is not my field but to my understanding it was a Mars ish size object and that's how we ended up with 2/3 of it folded into Earth and 1/3 plus some of Earths mass ejected into space to coalesce into the moon?

Mind you, I'm basing this off of some graphics I've seen and papers I've read years ago. Let me know if any of that sounds incorrect cuz I am not an authority.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 2 points 1 week ago

Saw a short on that the other day. Current understanding is that the Earth's mantle formed the Moon and Theia formed Earth's core. Maybe it also brought water to Earth.