this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
3 points (56.0% liked)
Ukraine
10707 readers
249 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Very weird to me that we're supposed to watch these random kids talk about world politics as if they have any authority, without giving us any context of who they are or why we should listen to them.
Checking out TLDR News on Wikipedia does not inspire a lot of confidence:
So it's political analysis by a marketing student turned computer scientist who does not consider himself a journalist. I couldn't find any information about who the people in the room with him are. But I could not find any reason why I would bother listening to any of them.
And I am willing to bet Kelly doesn't speak any other languages other than English.
It's the dilemma of the information age, there is so much content and a democratization of content distribution, but no way make people take responsibility for their actions (all run by mega platforms based in the US that care about nothing being engagement).
There will be a reckoning at some point. There always is. Just look at Europe pre-WW1. The zeitgeist of the time was that they were entering a period of unprecedented modernity; the telegraph, continental rail systems, fast (by the standards of the time) travel. Then WW1 hit and a mere 20 years later WW2.
I watched this guy during Brexit to keep up with the whole thing. He always seemed truthful and reported things without obvious bias. But I stopped watching once the Brexit hype started dying down and the channel started to go into more broad reporting topics.
I never felt they were trying to deceive or misinform, but I also wasn't very knowledgeable about the topics they were reporting.
I think your opinion is fair and a healthy way to look at it. They're not outright liars or anything, but they don't have a lot of credibility behind them either.
TLDR is the high school morning announcenents of world news. They mean well and try to be objective. But they lack the skill or insight to cover things beyond the surface level facts.